My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Comm 25-020 re Sugg. 25-01
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Board Packets
>
2025 Meetings
>
04 - July 14, 2025
>
2.0 - Communications
>
Comm 25-020 re Sugg. 25-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2025 6:55:32 AM
Creation date
7/10/2025 6:54:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comm. 25-020 <br />PONC Questions &Response <br />Re: Waiakahi`ula <br />• Na Hoa `Aina o Waiakahi`ula, Mala La`au, Kawai`ula, `Aha Lamaku `Oia`i`o, and <br />Malama o Puna are among the community groups expressing the desire to <br />steward these properties. Who do you think will take the lead and coordinate the <br />stewardship effort? <br />We would request that Kawai`ula be the lead steward, as our organization is both <br />based in and is dedicated to the ahupua`a of Waiakahi`ula. With that being said, we <br />are open to having the other hui participate in our efforts to malama this space. <br />• What does DPW think of blocking off the one -block portion of Papi`o Street and <br />routing access to nearby homes through Puna Parkway? <br />The current administration has expressed interest in protecting the burial; however, <br />they have not taken action that we know of. As we understand it, the road could be <br />impacted if/when the Burial Council approves amendments to the existing BTP to <br />include the county easement (which contains the human remains) and determines the <br />long-term preservation measures. The Burial Council may or may not decide that the <br />road be closed; at this point, our priority is to have the BTP amended to include the <br />County easement, then support the DPW in following the law. The process of <br />amending the BTP to include the County easement must be initiated from the County. <br />• Is DPW willing to block off parking in the burial site buffers? <br />Neil Azevedo of DPW visited the site on February 27, 2025. He was verbally supportive <br />of the effort to amend the BTP to include the County easement. He had Flexible <br />Delineator Round Post parking barriers installed within 24 hours of our meeting. Please <br />note that these temporary measures to protect the burial site may not meet the <br />requirements of a Burial Council approval. <br />• Will a vacation rental be permitted by the Planning Department on the parcel <br />where the owner intends to develop a vacation rental "immediately?" In other <br />words, is this a realistic proposal or an empty threat? <br />The BTP only protects a 30` no -build preservation buffer that extends from the <br />perimeter of the burial platform (which includes the wall 20` west of the platform). Any <br />construction outside of that area could be potentially permitted. The current <br />landowner has expressed that he read the BTP and plans to develop outside the <br />buffer. There is about 50` of "developable" land on the Papio St property line. By our <br />estimation, there is at least 0.13 acres that is legal to develop on. Therefore this is still <br />a realistic threat. Please see attached images for clarification regarding potential <br />development: <br />N.Woo-O'Brien & L.Gouker <br />June 2025 <br />V <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.