Laserfiche WebLink
Fuke: So, if he were 21 years old and he sold it to you because that's who he had sold the <br />alcohol to, so there would not have been a violation? <br />Takase: Well, since she was there it wouldn't be, but even if he's 21, they need to have a <br />manager on duty. So if she's there, yes I don't think we would have charged them, but when <br />she's not there, just because he's 21 he could not sell without having a manager there. <br />Crozier: Ora blue card? <br />Takase: Well, we gave him a blue card so he's taken the test but because he's not 21 he can't <br />really be the manager. <br />Crozier: Right, exactly, yes. <br />Fuke: So, those times that he sold it to you, if that person were 21 and above, it would not <br />have been a violation, correct? <br />Gonzalez: Only if she was on duty. <br />Crozier: Which I'm always on duty because I'm salary, yes so technically I was the manager <br />on duty, so even if he had sold it to me, it falls within the correct legality. If he was under and <br />nobody was there with a PIAC (person in active charge) card, then it would be illegal. <br />Takase: Well, so if that was the only situation where he was just selling to her, we would not <br />have charged that, even if she's I suppose she's not technically on duty because now she's <br />buying the liquor, but you know she's there so you know it's kind of cutting things a little thin, <br />so we would have not charged them. <br />Hughes: So, Gerald, under the liquor regulations, can a manager be buying liquor? <br />Takase: No, not while they are on duty. <br />Hughes: But she's always on duty. <br />Takase: Well, if she's there, you know. She was there but she was going home I think, that's <br />why she was buying liquor. <br />Crozier: It was the end of my day. <br />Takase: Yeah, so you know technically it would still be a violation, but I don't think that's <br />why we charged them for that specific instance. You know, he was there at times by himself <br />basically and I kind of understood that they had some problems with staffing, but you know we <br />kind of warned them the first time and told them what to do to just put up a signs. If he's the <br />only one there he can't sell, but it kind of continued and that's why we're here. So, I think what <br />Robert said they've corrected it now, they have sufficient personnel, so hopefully it will not be a <br />problem in the future. <br />Fuke: So essentially then, the sale to a person in active charge is okay as long as you're <br />taking it home, you're taking it away. <br />MINUTES - LIQUOR ADJUDICATION BOARD MEETING - THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2024 - KONA PAGE 6 OF 56 <br />