My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-06-17 GMAC Minutes Final Draft
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025-06-17 GMAC Minutes Final Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2025 8:59:20 AM
Creation date
9/10/2025 8:59:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. COMMISSIONER REPORT BY DISTRICT: <br /> LT: Each commissioner provides an update and shares concerns about their prospective <br /> district. Commissioners to decide on whether to add those topics to the next meeting. <br /> Invite the public to provide testimony and presentation at the meeting. Permitted <br /> interaction groups(PIG) may be created at this time.There will otherwise be no discussion <br /> or voting, which is reserved to be itemized on a future agenda. I just want to make a note <br /> on this; I did talk to Corp Counsel, like Barbara just said, some of the commissioners <br /> provide an actual report in writing. The way we set up our commissioner's reports, we <br /> are planning on having a report but having it as a presentation. <br /> SW: So, your report is agendized <br /> LT: Yep <br /> SW: Because it really shouldn't be like free for all or whatever it is that you're thinking of at <br /> that moment. It should be an actual report, so that the members of the public can see <br /> what that report is and provide any testimony at that time. So,technically this isn't really <br /> meeting the qualification for a notice because the public doesn't have notice of what the <br /> commissioners will be reporting on ahead of time. So that's the point and reason for the <br /> change. So that we can be a little more correct. <br /> LT: I like that, because of the ideas that I have coming out to these meetings. I want us to <br /> have more support at our meetings from people who are trending on the same topics as <br /> us. So, if we talk about the boat harbor, to have boat people inside here, the actual <br /> agenda item that they can testify on, which is just on our report. Let's do our district <br /> report, starting with District 1. Mr. Robert Duerr... <br /> RD: District 1-Robert Duerr,that's a very good helpful suggestion. In the past few months, I've <br /> been submitting items for agenda that seemingly has not been recognized. This past <br /> month I submitted two items to be considered for the agenda, and that agenda could also <br /> be my district report. I bring these items for today as my district report. The First item <br /> that I would like ummm...my concern District 1 is, I'd like to propose, I'd like make a <br /> motion that we add to... <br /> SW: No, not yet, you should give your report. <br /> RD: Essentially the discussion in action, I sent to Barbara to include on the agenda on June 6 <br /> this past month for a discussion and action on the Ethics and Legality of the Hawaii County <br /> GMAC assigned Corp Counsel's cancellation of the GMAC agenda presentation on the <br /> General Plan. The supplemental information that I included on that, is from the Hawaii <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.