Laserfiche WebLink
South Point to Ho` okena. The Mayor asked Governor Cayetano if he would release funds if he <br />was successful in asking the Legislature for funding again, this time for a plan. This was agreed to, <br />and $500,000.00 was budgeted and released. Townscape, Inc., was hired for preparation of this <br />report. In the report on Page 1 -4, Townscape has done an excellent job in pointing out the benefits <br />to be derived from having a plan adopted and bringing water to this area -- talking about fire <br />protection, public health -- better system than catchment, also ability to have a health clinic if there <br />is water available. The idea of bringing a school to the area has been stymied by lack of water. <br />Another obvious issue is droughts. Old- timers will talk about the maps they were shown when <br />they first purchased their properties where there was something like 80 inches of rain a year, and <br />now it appears they are getting about 20 inches of rain a year -- drastic changes. Also the agriculture <br />and economic potential of the area is enormous. <br />After Ms. Hillarie Keehne's ( Townscape, Inc.) review of the draft plan, questions were as follows: <br />Ms. Scarr asked why the stand -alone well in Opihihale in the alternative study was not explored <br />financially, instead of the Ho`okena extension. It is a big difference in price if you are talking <br />about 335 in Kona Paradise and only 100 stretched along the other 5'/2 miles. Then the <br />cost - effective thing to do soon would be to go for the Opihihale well at $1.7 million vs. the <br />Ho`okena extension at $5.1 million when you are only serving 3/4 of the available customers. <br />Ms. Keehne explained that the stand -alone well only serves that section of the community, whereas <br />there are residents spread from Ho`okena to Opihihale. The 100 customers are just those that <br />already have structures along the highway. Not all 335 lots have homes on them. If they did a <br />community improvement district, they would all be required to contribute. Another difficulty with <br />a stand -alone well is lack of integration with existing systems. <br />Ms. Scarr commented that the most of the Department's systems are not connected now, and we <br />can live with stand -alone systems if they are serving significant numbers of people. <br />Mr. Wilkins was troubled with the statement that the average water consumption under the new <br />plan would run 40 to 60 gallons per person, per day. Assuming there are multiple people in an <br />average household, this would still be only' /4 of the current allocation to other people on the island, <br />which is 600 gallons per day. He asked if the Plan is assuming that people will still rely on <br />catchment water and wondered how many people are aware of this. <br />Ms. Keehne stated that they have stated throughout this process that this is to supplement existing <br />catchment systems. Right now, this plan only calls for putting in a spigot at the well site so there <br />would be no distribution. <br />Mr. Wilkins felt that it would make more sense to put in a larger pipeline, and the plans are <br />shortsighted in that respect. <br />Mr. Kawamura explained that pipe size is based on projected population growth. They did not <br />want to oversize any pipe because if you start running the water and there is no usage, you would <br />have to flush that water out because it becomes stale. <br />Mr. Wilkins disagreed and pointed out that you could always keep a pipe empty or have it on <br />standby. It is cheaper to put in a larger pipe than to have to dig another ditch. <br />Page 6 of 25 4- 27 -04min (Ocean View).doc <br />