Laserfiche WebLink
Hawaii Police Commission <br /> Regular Session Minutes <br /> September 19, 2025 <br /> Page 7 <br /> HR to screen them. The commission will then need to determine the questions to be asked <br /> in the interrogatories, which will be sent to the candidates. After reviewing the candidates' <br /> responses, the commission will decide who to interview. He noted that if additional time is <br /> needed, it can be taken, and a special meeting could be scheduled if needed and desired. <br /> The pace and approach are at the commission's discretion. He added that if needed, the <br /> commission can form a permitted interaction group (PIG) to review interrogatories and <br /> recommend a top group of candidates (e.g., top five or another number determined by the <br /> commission). The full commission must then review the PIG's recommendations and make <br /> the final selection. The PIG may also conduct interviews to narrow down the pool (e.g., top <br /> 10) down to the finalists, but the commission as a whole is responsible for interviewing the <br /> final candidates and making the ultimate selection. <br /> Vice Chair Bertsch expressed that when conducting public interviews of the final <br /> candidates, the commission should televise the sessions. He requested additional staffing <br /> assistance to support the secretary, noting that the last selection process was demanding <br /> for her. <br /> DCC Salas-Ferguson explained that if the commission holds an interactive remote <br /> meeting, the public must be allowed to participate via Zoom. However, if the commission <br /> chooses only to film or stream the meeting, the public may watch but not interact. Vice <br /> Chair Bertsch asked whether public testimony is required during the interview process. <br /> DCC Salas-Ferguson confirmed that the public has the right to provide testimony at any <br /> commission meeting. He clarified that remote participation via Zoom is required for <br /> interactive meetings, but for one-way streams, such as broadcasting via Facebook, <br /> participation is not required. <br /> Commissioner Tavares stated that the drafted timeline seems reasonable. Chair Robinson <br /> and Vice Chair Bertsch expressed no opposition, noting it is similar to the previous <br /> selection process, but emphasized the importance of filling the chief position as soon as <br /> possible. Tavares suggested reviewing individual items to identify areas that could be <br /> compressed to expedite the process. <br /> Vice Chair Bertsch noted that in the last selection, recruitment opened on August 1 and <br /> closed on August 28, with a chief appointed by December 16. He highlighted the need to <br /> act quickly, as other counties are also recruiting, and the early bird gets the best <br /> candidates. <br /> Commissioner Botelho proposed starting recruitment on November 2, describing it as <br /> aggressive, but Vice Chair Bertsch questioned the need to wait two months, suggesting <br /> posting immediately once the announcement is finalized. Chair Robinson confirmed <br /> general agreement on the announcement, with updates made to the salary and <br /> recruitment dates. He emphasized the commission's responsibility to the community and <br /> the department to fill the chief position as soon as possible. <br />