My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-05-31 Filed Corrected Petition (PL-BOA-2025-000119) and Submitted New Petition (PL-BOA-2025-000121)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2025-000119 Rohr (PD)
>
2025-05-31 Filed Corrected Petition (PL-BOA-2025-000119) and Submitted New Petition (PL-BOA-2025-000121)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2025 8:03:49 AM
Creation date
6/3/2025 1:11:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
qr .,. <br /> ' ,. „ . er g <br /> a �- _� R.. <br /> ,1 , , - yam , <br /> r <br /> p i. k. 1 , ,., <br /> 4,,. . <br /> r , _ . * i',,,,y,.. , -,. , 7.- <br /> / <br /> ML_F Rye A <br /> T y <br /> ^f , <br /> ...�y <br /> ., enwMwwww _ • '• <br /> siil� -_. .•..umwaa..a�mw wwa .Wow, -.: <br /> Oeoe Street, Hilo, looking mauka towards Nene Street. The driveway for <br /> 14 Oeoe Street is on the right. <br /> (3) A plain statement of the nature of the appeal and the relief requested. <br /> This is an appeal of the Planning Director's April 11, 2025 letter decision to <br /> exempt the development described in PL-SAA-2025-000280 from SMA review. <br /> Exhibit A. <br /> Relief Requested: <br /> Reverse the Planning Director's decision to exempt the project and Remand PL-SAA <br /> 2025-000280 with appropriate instructions for SMA permit procedures under PC Rule 9- <br /> 11, based upon the preponderance of evidence, that: (1) The director erred in his decision <br /> and it is clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence on <br /> the whole record; (2) The decision violated the Code and other applicable laws; and (3) <br /> The decision was characterized by an abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise <br /> of discretion. <br /> (4) A statement explaining: <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.