My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-10-22 Appellants Exhibit 7_Aluli v. Lewin
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2025-000121 Rohr (DPW)
>
2025-10-22 Appellants Exhibit 7_Aluli v. Lewin
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2025 10:39:28 AM
Creation date
10/23/2025 10:39:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, 405 U.S. 156, 170, 92 S. Ct. 839, 847, 31 L. Ed. 2d no <br /> (1972). <br /> IV. <br /> HRS § 342B-32 authorizes issuance of a permit in accordance with rules. Rules are <br /> necessary to ensure fairness and to minimize unbridled use of discretion of an agency. <br /> In the absence of rules governing the standards of emissions of H2S into the air, DOH was <br /> required to refuse the issuance of the ATC permit to True pursuant to HRS § 342B-32• <br /> The order of the circuit court is reversed and this case is remanded for the issuance of <br /> injunctive relief ordering True to stop any action based on the ATC permit which allows <br /> construction that would emit H2S into the air, and for the issuance of an order requiring <br /> DOH to promulgate rules consistent with this opinion governing H2S emissions into the <br /> air. <br /> NOTES <br /> r] Associate Justice Hayashi,who heard oral argument and who signed the opinion in this <br /> case, retired from the court on March 29, 1992. See HRS § 602-10 (1985). <br /> [i]At the time True submitted its application, HRS § 342-22 (1985)was in effect. In <br /> pertinent part, it provided: <br /> In addition to any other power or duty prescribed by law in this part, the director shall <br /> prevent, control, and abate air pollution in the State. In the discharge of this duty, the <br /> director may: <br /> (3) Require private persons or agencies or governmental agencies engaged or desiring to <br /> engage in operations which result or may result in air pollution to secure a permit prior to <br /> installation or operation or continued operation. The director shall refuse to issue the <br /> permit unless it appears that the operations would be in compliance with the rules and <br /> regulations of the department and the state ambient air quality standards. <br /> § 342-22 was repealed in 1989 and replaced by§ 342B-32 which was in effect when the <br /> permit was finally issued. For purposes of this appeal, there are no substantive differences <br /> in the two sections. <br /> APPELLANT EXHIBIT 7, pg. 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.