My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-08-08 PL-BOA-2025-000123 Petition
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2025-000123 Frazier (DPW)
>
2025-08-08 PL-BOA-2025-000123 Petition
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2025 8:14:18 AM
Creation date
8/11/2025 8:14:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• From 19-3812 Old Volcano Rd. to 19-3912 Old Volcano Rd. there are 25 or so <br /> properties with road access through the public right of way. Only 2 of these <br /> properties have paved driveways along this/mile stretch of road.The remainder <br /> have gravel driveways. Nearly all of these properties have dwellings and are of a <br /> residentual nature, these driveways all see regular vehicular traffic. Yet my <br /> property with no dwellings,address,or utilities,which is being grubbed to become <br /> a grass field requires a paved driveway to simply access the property. I find this <br /> unfair, and unfitting of the situation. <br /> In Conclusion: <br /> The property in question, is unoccupied, agriculturally zoned and being utilized as such. <br /> It is also in the process of being grubbed, as the present permits attest to, yet I am being <br /> required to have permanent paved driveways for Grubbing to continue, and/or to simply <br /> access a vacant agricultural lot.This Logic is unreasonable. <br /> I find this judgment,that my property in its present state and usage to being required <br /> by the County to have a permanent (residential) driveway installed, as premature, <br /> impractical, unreasonable and unfair. <br /> I request that this requirement for a paved driveway be deferred until a more appropriate <br /> time,as having a fence with a gate,and the ability to access a vacant agricultural lot,does <br /> not constitute a need for a residential driveway. <br /> When the land is used for something other than agricultral purposes, such as a <br /> residentual dwelling, building permits would be required to be submitted at which point <br /> a driveway would also be necessary and the proper permits submitted. <br /> At this point and time in the development of the property, I have no intent to drive or allow <br /> regular vehicular traffic on this property, and therefore should not be required to have a <br /> paved, permanent driveway, at this point and time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.