My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-07-18 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025-07-18 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2025 2:10:07 PM
Creation date
12/2/2025 1:34:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board July 18, 2025 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Addendum to Agenda (Item 2) <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: There’s no addendum to the agenda, from what I understand from our <br />Secretary. <br /> <br />Statements from the Public (Item 3) <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: “Statements from the Public”—I understand, Mr. Hong, you have a <br />statement to make? <br /> <br />(At this time, Mr. Ted H. S. Hong, Esquire, Attorney at Law, came forward.) <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: And this is regarding the annual performance evaluation of the Director of <br />the Department of Human Resources, is that correct? <br /> <br />MR. HONG: That’s correct. <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: You may proceed. <br /> <br />MR. HONG: Thank you. Good morning, Madam Chair, and members of the Merit Appeals <br />Board. My name is Ted Hong, I’m speaking as a regular citizen today or for now. <br /> <br />In terms of Item number 7 on the Board’s agenda, my concern as a member of the public is that <br />the Director of the Department of Human Resources needs to be independent. Free from <br />influence by the Mayor, the department heads, and even the unions—and I bring up two <br />examples. <br /> <br />The Turner Lyndon case and the Jonah Kaye case. The Director used a (inaudible) interpretation <br />of civil service rules and regulations to support department heads and the mayor. I would—I’m <br />speaking this morning because when you get to Item number 7, my hope is that the Board <br />ensures that whoever’s director can actually say “no” to a mayor, can actually say “no” to a <br />department or union and not enable poor, illegal choices that prejudice employees. <br /> <br />And the prejudice to the employees is when we moved for attorney’s fees and costs used in the <br />Turner Lyndon case and the Jonah Kaye case, you saw how much it costs for employees, out of <br />their own pocket, to present their case before the Board. Shouldn’t have to be that way. And <br />even though that probably undercuts my business, they shouldn’t have to do that, and they <br />shouldn’t have to suffer to make that out (inaudible), in terms of personal expenses. <br /> <br />And that’s why I’m here to say, in terms of, whoever is the department director, make sure that <br />they’re—I hope the Board makes sure they’re independent and can say “no” to the mayor. I’ve <br />been in the room with Michael Ben—Mayor Yamashiro, when I was at Corporation Counsel— <br />oh, he was very insistent. He was very independent. He told the mayor “no.” <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.