My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-11-20 Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Minutes
>
2009
>
2009-11-20 Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 9:13:00 AM
Creation date
6/16/2011 11:28:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
department to continue posting minutes and agendas on their website. Larry stated he will bring <br />language for an amendment to section IX to the next meeting. <br />b. Conflicts of Interest. Wes brought up section XV. "Conflicts of Interest ". He felt a <br />member with a conflict of interest should be able to discuss the matter. Amy Self said that these <br />guidelines are more restrictive than the County Code of Ethics. Wes moved to amend item a. to <br />read "the affected person shall... (2) withdraw from disetissi .n a voting on the matter." Frank <br />seconded the motion. All in favor but Keiki, who suggested that withdrawing from voting be left <br />up to the individual rather than being mandated. Wes moved to reconsider the previous motion, <br />Larry H. seconded. All in favor. Wes made a motion to amend section XV a. to read "AC <br />members shall act in compliance with County Code of Ethics." Larry H. seconded. Larry <br />Brown pointed out that the AC has very little decision - making authority on anything that would <br />make a financial impact and is an advisory body. Amy pointed out that advisory boards are not <br />covered under the county's code of ethics and that the decision - making body is the Planning <br />Department. Keiki asked whether section XV is necessary. Amy said it could be deleted. <br />Barbara said she felt it should be left in. Dan called for question, motion passed with none <br />opposed. <br />c. Permit applications. Frank asked for clarification on section IV. k. Larry Brown <br />explained that the planning director would only ask for input on projects having land -use <br />compliance issues in the Puna CDP project area. When directed, Larry would put such items on <br />the AC agenda; the AC would have 60 days to review and 30 days to issue comments. Frank <br />asked if permit requests for Puna are tracked separately. Larry informed him they are not. <br />d. Membership termination. Frank made a motion to strike section V. g. 2. "by <br />direction of the mayor" to read "mayor submits recommendation to remove AC member, and the <br />County Council confirms termination ", which he said is consistent with county charter section <br />13 -4 "Boards and Commissions" item d. Amy Self said that guideline is in conflict with the <br />county charter. She said she is in the process of making other changes to the guidelines. Frank <br />asked if the guidelines could be marked to indicate those mandated by law. Larry H. moved to <br />table discussion until more information is available. Maddie seconded. All voted in favor. <br />e. Frank brought attention to section XVI of the guidelines regarding how amendments of <br />the rules of practice and procedure can be approved. Amy said she will go through and take out <br />what shouldn't be in the guidelines with respect to chapters 13 and 16 of the county charter. The <br />chair clarified that agenda item 5, "Adoption of operating guidelines ", was tabled until the next <br />draft is presented. <br />4. Determine regular meeting schedule: <br />Larry Brown pointed out that the AC should not hold meetings that would require him to work <br />overtime due to budget limitations. He said he could adjust his work day to accommodate a 4 -6 <br />p.m. meeting time. Because of special considerations next month, Barbara determined it best to <br />schedule the December meeting separately and decide on a regular meeting schedule later. <br />Discussion indicated regular meetings would most likely be held on Thursdays. Wes asked if two <br />hours was enough time to conduct business. Larry said he didn't want to go beyond that to <br />prevent burnout. Wes moved the next meeting be held Friday, Dec. 18 from 4 -6 p.m. at the <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.