My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-01-21 Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-01-21 Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 9:15:46 AM
Creation date
6/16/2011 11:28:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B. CDP amendment process <br />(i) Public can propose amendments and submit to Action Committee (AC) <br />(ii) County Council (CC) can submit to Planning Director (PD), PD will forward to AC <br />review for review and comment <br />(iii) Recommendations from AC may include proposed amendments from public, sub- <br />committees, or members <br />(iv) After review by AC, PD forwards with comments to Planning Commission (PC) for <br />review and recommendations to CC. If AC disagrees with PD recommendations, can <br />send testimony or appear at PC hearings. PC holds public hearing and forwards <br />recommendations to CC. CC can make non - substantive amendments without going back <br />to AC & PC. Tag -on amendments can't be added to others in process. <br />(v) AC Members can testify before PC and CC as individuals, but must be authorized by AC <br />to speak on their behalf. AC might want to designate a representative to testify before the <br />PC and CC. Amendments adopted by CC and signed by the Mayor then become <br />incorporated into the PCDP. <br />(vi) Amendment timeline <br />1. The Planning Director has 60 days or a longer period, as may be agreed to by the CC <br />to submit recommendations to the PC. AC review and comment period is part of <br />Planning Director review and comment period. Although AC is not being given an <br />absolute deadline for submitting recommendations to the Planning Director, the <br />process should be completed as quickly as possible. All AC decision making shall be <br />in public meetings which provide for public testimony. When of the Planning <br />Director receives the amendments proposed in Bill 194 from CC, they will be placed <br />on next month's agenda. <br />2. For process to move, amendments need to get back to CC within a year, esp. if not <br />extensive. <br />(vii) May want to break up amendments into sections to address at different meetings. <br />C. CDP implementation <br />(i) Capital Improvement Projects: AC should make recommendations to the CC regarding <br />projects that should be included in the CIP if they would help implement the CDP. <br />(ii) AC needs to advocate for things like infrastructure, parks and public use structures in <br />order to get money for those things. AC has more weight than average citizen. AC's role <br />is to get County to do some things for the community's vision of Puna. <br />(iii) Amendments: What is needed to further items in original action plan, i.e. propose <br />amendments to other codes: subdivision code, zoning code. AC would send <br />recommendations to the Planning Director for review and possible action. <br />(iv) Look not only at the CDP, but the county code and budget in terms of getting <br />implemented what you want. Budget process is just starting. <br />(v) Dan asked if studies would qualify for CIP budgeting. BJ said it would depend on the <br />type of project and which department would be appropriate and have primary <br />responsibility. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.