My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-09-24 Salary Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025-09-24 Salary Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/24/2025 2:14:40 PM
Creation date
12/24/2025 2:12:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission September 24, 2025 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />So, it really, I think, requires this body to decide how you want to proceed, as a whole. And in <br />order to adopt any changes, such as are being proposed here—we’re going to need a two-thirds <br />vote of this membership. So, I think it’s all relevant and I think, ultimately, you need to know <br />how is it that you want to proceed as a body? Do you find it necessary to carve out any of the <br />ones that may or may not have changes? <br /> <br />I know that HR has already indicated to Commissioner Namahoe that she could provide us that <br />information about possible inversions. So, if you want that, then I guess I caution you to keep <br />pushing forward right now with adopting Findings that would, theoretically, cover all of the <br />departments—if you’re not going to have had time to see what those potential inversion <br />situations are. <br /> <br />So, in fairness, right, what we do—what this body does is super important. So, I want to make <br />sure you have all the necessary facts and information to ensure that you’re comfortable adopting <br />or continuing to propose the potential adoption of these Findings, ‘cause right now it sounds like <br />you don’t necessarily have all of that information. So, yeah. <br /> <br />CHR. PAVAO: I think that—department, definitely, is inversion because most of the collective <br />st <br />bargaining units got pay raises July 1 and the appointing and elected officials didn’t—so, <br />there’s already some level of inversion. <br /> <br />Ask Chief Todd—if you have an opinion about removing the Fire and the Police Chief’s <br />positions from this, until we get the findings of the collective bargaining? <br /> <br />MR. TODD: So, I understand you guys want to proceed. Why not just align it with whatever <br />that organizations primary bargaining unit is, so if they primarily recognize HGEA—or 51% of <br />the employees in an organizational unit or department or HGEA—then align—leave directors <br />salary increases with the same for the primary unit represented. <br /> <br />Basically, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. You don’t want to end up with an <br />inversion. So, you just say, “All right, HFFA is the primary one for Fire”—so it aligns with the <br />director or the Fire Chief aligns with whatever HFFA gets. And then you don’t have to set a <br />designated number. It’s just—we’re saying we want to maintain, basically, a same alignment, <br />right—and then that way you’re not worried about when the arbitration ends or how it finalizes <br />and everything else. And then, for example, if Fire ends up taking another two years or <br />something like—they can always be back dated at some other point in the future. <br /> <br />But, yeah, I believe we’re scheduled for December, so it’ll probably take a few months after that, <br />but I’m not particularly worried—you guys do pay me very well. Thank you very much. I <br />appreciate you very much. <br /> <br />With that said, I put my letter in because I think from the County’s perspective, our goal should <br />be to have the best quality of leadership, if we’re looking to produce the best government. And <br />then, vice-versa, if we want to offer middling salaries, we’ll get middling leaders running our <br />departments and a government that does a middling job. So, that’s my opinion. <br />Page 10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.