Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Salary Commission September 24, 2025 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MS. NAMAHOE: I think this is important language. It’s also, like, small language on a <br />prospectus kind of thing. This is an important index point. I’d almost want to move this to the <br />very end, just to bookend the whole work. This is an important paragraph. It should be happily- <br />ever-after. We are also doing all of this to make sure that we’re including inversion issues. <br /> <br />MS. FRENZ: Are you still talking about old Number 9? <br /> <br />CHR. PAVAO: Ten. <br /> <br />MS. NAMAHOE: I’m talking about old Number 10. <br /> <br />MS. FRENZ: Oh, okay. So, before we move on to that one, let’s finish—I don’t think we got <br />confirmation everyone’s okay with old Number 9. <br /> <br />CHR. PAVAO: Yeah, nine is fine. <br /> <br />MS. FRENZ: And can we just verify with Director Tokihiro that it continues today to be an <br />accurate statement about BUs 11, 12, and 15? <br /> <br />MS. TOKIHIRO: Yes. As of today. <br /> <br />MS. FRENZ: Okay, thank you. So, the only adjustment for old Number 9 would be the last <br />sentence, and it would be inserting in front of 2024, “July 1.” <br /> <br />MS. NAMAHOE: That’s right. <br /> <br />CHR. PAVAO: Mm-hmm. <br /> <br />MS. FRENZ: Okay. All right. So—okay, moving on to old Number 10. Go ahead, <br />Commissioner Namahoe—apologies. <br /> <br />MS. NAMAHOE: I—no, all I wanted to say was that this was an important point. I almost <br />would like to pull it out and make it the last point about inversion because it might get lost in it. <br />It’s—there’s a lot of meat that we have to go through here. I almost want this to be the last—I’d <br />like this—I mean, the last point. <br /> <br />Because people are going to read it and then they’re going to get—they’re not going to catch that <br />point, but we need people to understand, that’s really why we’re here. <br /> <br />ʻAUHAUʻauhau. So, if we do move it <br />MS. KAWA: Commission Kawa—Number 12 talks <br />about it, again—like, refers back to it. I know Number 12 says, “…avoid further inversion <br />scenarios…”—so then, that would be moved, too, so that—‘cause then, if this comes out of <br />nowhere and we didn’t talk about inversion yet, then it might not be as clear as to what inversion <br />is. <br /> <br />Page 26 <br /> <br /> <br />