My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2026-01-02 Appellants 2nd Amended Petition (PL-BOA-2025-000119)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2025-000119 Rohr (PD)
>
2026-01-02 Appellants 2nd Amended Petition (PL-BOA-2025-000119)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2026 11:52:58 AM
Creation date
1/6/2026 11:52:40 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. The lack of an off-street parking plan at the subject property creates <br /> ingress/egress and on-street parking issues causing dangerous road <br /> conditions with cumulative and significantly adverse effects on the social <br /> welfare, activities and walkability of the community. <br /> PL-SAA-2025-000280 application was incomplete. It did not follow the <br /> instructions and was not accompanied by the required site plan: <br /> A site plan of the subject property, drawn to scale, showing all <br /> existing and proposed structures, uses and activities. <br /> Information such as the extent of any land alteration grading) <br /> activities and the location of a cliff or other distinctive land <br /> features should be shown on the plans. Photographs of the <br /> subject property and the project site showing existing conditions <br /> are not required but would greatly facilitate the review process. <br /> The building plans submitted with PL-SAA-2025-000280 application has <br /> an insufficient plot plan and, by accepting it as complete, the Planning <br /> Director violated Planning Commission Rule 9-10 Assessment (b)(2): <br /> "A plot plan of the property, drawn to scale, with all proposed and existing <br /> structures shown thereon and any other information necessary to a proper <br /> determination relative to the specific request." <br /> 5. HRS §205A-22(2) definitions provides the caveat: "...provided that <br /> whenever the authority finds that any excluded use, activity, or operation <br /> may have a cumulative impact, or a significant environmental or ecological <br /> effect on a special management area, that use, activity, or operation shall <br /> be defined as "development" for the purpose of this part." <br /> The Planning Director approved an exemption for development that <br /> increases the capacity of the transient accommodation to hold gatherings <br /> and parties at 14 Oeoe Street. On-street parking and egress issues at 14 <br /> Oeoe Street are directly traceable to the transient accommodation guests. <br /> The guests often arrive in large groups that drive in separate vehicles. The <br /> vehicles backing into 14 Oeoe Street or into the driveway cause cumulative <br /> impact and/or significant adverse effects on the surrounding community— <br /> blocking vehicles turning onto Oeoe Street from Kalaianaole Street, <br /> creating tsunami evacuation congestion, diminished fire protection and <br /> access to other emergency services; and unsafe conditions for bicyclists and <br /> pedestrians. <br /> Therefore, the Planning Director's "SMA exemption" violates HRS §205A- <br /> 22(2). <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.