My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-12-10 Cultural Resources Commission Meeting
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Cultural Resources Commission
>
Materials
>
2026
>
2026-02-11
>
Kolekole Stream Bridge (PL-CRC-2025-000040)
>
2025-12-10 Cultural Resources Commission Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2026 9:08:31 AM
Creation date
1/20/2026 9:09:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
[SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:55:12] Commissioner Six emphasized that it was very <br /> important to test some of the mounds before proceeding further with the planning process, given <br /> the number of mounds present on the parcel. She stated that development would be very <br /> challenging until it could be confirmed that the mounds were agricultural in nature, noting that <br /> they were spread throughout the parcel and that some areas were better preserved than others. <br /> [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 1:57:22] Commissioner Kinney asked about the swamp area, <br /> inquiring whether it had been surveyed and how stable it was. He questioned how the area had <br /> been previously used and asked about the disturbance history of the site. He also asked about <br /> the retaining walls and whether any dating could be conducted. In addition, he inquired whether <br /> preserved materials might indicate what had been grown in those areas and referenced the pig <br /> enclosure on the property. <br /> Mr. Barna responded that the swamp area was not within the project area. He stated that only a <br /> surface survey had been completed and that the surface evidence dated to the 19th century, <br /> although the site was known to be older. He explained that further investigation would occur <br /> during the identification or data recovery phase to determine what had been grown there. Mr. <br /> Barna added that the pig enclosure was the only major feature on the property and that it was <br /> clear and flat on the interior. <br /> [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 2:02:10] Commissioner Six raised concerns about the sacred <br /> nature of springs and their association with the mo`o, noting that sacred and agricultural uses <br /> are often inseparable. Commissioner Keakealani spoke about place names and the stories <br /> embedded in them, stating that they are indicative of the wai and the mo`o wahine. She also <br /> referenced the Commission on Water Resource Management(CWRM)and its role in protecting <br /> wai, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding water resources and preventing the pollution <br /> of any punawai. <br /> [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 2:05:27] Commissioner Gamayo motioned to continue this <br /> agenda item to the next meeting. Commissioner Kinney seconded the motion. No discussion <br /> occurred and the motion passed with a unanimous aye vote. <br /> This matter concluded at 12:13 p.m. <br /> Commissioner Six left the meeting at 12:13 p.m., and Chair Clark returned. Quorum was confirmed <br /> with five commissioners. The commissioners took a recess, and the meeting was called back to order <br /> at 12:19 p.m. <br /> ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS <br /> 1. Approval of minutes for the meeting held on November 12,2025. <br /> [SEE YOUTUBE TIMESTAMP 2:14:48] Vice Chair Haumea motioned to approve the minutes <br /> as circulated; seconded by Commissioner Keakealani. No discussion occurred. The minutes <br /> were approved without opposition with a unanimous aye voice vote. <br /> Cultural Resources Commission <br /> December 10,2025 Minutes <br /> Page 9 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.