Laserfiche WebLink
Merit Appeals Board October 30, 2025 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: Not all. <br /> <br />MS. BOND: For some divisions? <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: Why don’t we just say “…for those…”— <br /> <br />MS. BOND: “…for many divisions...” <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: —“…for the HR divisions identified in question number 5 above.” <br /> <br />MS. BOND: (Inaudible.) <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: “…for the HR divisions identified in question number 5 above.” <br /> <br />MS. BOND: “…for HR divisions…”—yeah. Okay. Okay, so “The significant increase reflects <br />the challenges and efforts for…”— <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: “…for the divisions identified…” <br /> <br />MS. BOND: “…for HR divisions...” <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: “…identified in question number 5 above.” <br /> <br />MS. TOKIHIRO: I think we’re going to need one more reading of that. <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: Okay, one more reading is fine. <br /> <br />MS. BOND: And one more time for those new studio audience. <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: Okay. <br /> <br />MS. BOND: “The significant increase reflects the challenges and efforts of HR divisions <br />identified in response to question number 5 above”—is that correct? That work for everybody? <br />(Inaudible.) I did mine in pencil, it’s all scribbled up—for HR divisions. Does that work for <br />everybody? Sorry, the grammar in me just couldn’t go there. <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: “The significant increase reflects the challenges and efforts for the HR <br />divisions identified in question number 5 above.” <br /> <br />MS. BOND: “…in response to question number 5.” Yeah. <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: Period. And it’s—then it’s okay. <br /> <br />MS. BOND: End of sentence. <br />Page 27 <br /> <br /> <br />