Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Merit Appeals Board November 21, 2025 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />HRS sections 92-4, 92-5(a)(2) and 92-5(a)(4), for the purpose of evaluating an officer or <br />employee of the County of Hawaiʻi, where the consideration of matters affecting privacy will be <br />involved and consulting with the Board’s attorney on questions and issues pertaining to the <br />Board’s powers, duties, privileges, immunities, and liabilities. A 2/3 vote of the members <br />present pursuant to HRS section 92-4 is necessary to hold an executive meeting. <br /> <br />So, I’m going to go back and read Communication B and C, since we’re going to go into <br />executive session—once I have a motion that’s approved. <br /> <br />B. Communication No. 25-03.16, Received On October 27, 2025, From Deputy Attorney <br />General Trisha C. Gibo, Requesting To Provide An Information Update Concerning The <br />Following Matter: PPC133 Tony Enriquez In The Matter Of Merit Appeals Board – <br />Order Granting Petitions For Intervention; Notice Of Hearing On The Petition For <br />Declaratory Ruling (Case No. 25-DR-00-133). Reference: MAB Communication Nos. 24- <br />13 And 25-03 <br /> <br />C. Communication No. 25-08, Received On November 13, 2025, From Deputy Attorney <br />General Trisha C. Gibo, Requesting To Provide An Information Update Concerning The <br />Following Matter: SCWC Loyola V. County Of Hawaiʻi (SCWC-22-0000641) ((1) <br />Application For Writ Of Certiorari From The June 27, 2025 \[Dkt.54\] Summary Disposition <br />Order Of The Intermediate Court Of Appeals 2) Appellee-Appellee County Of Hawaiʻi <br />Response To Application For Writ Of Certiorari From The June 27, 2025 \[Dkt.54\] <br />Summary Disposition Order Of The Intermediate Court Of Appeals, Filed On September <br />25, 2025 \[Dkt.1\]; And 3) Appellant’s Reply To Appellee Appellee-Appellee County Of <br />Hawaiʻi Response To Application For Writ Of Certiorari From The June 27, 2025 \[Dkt.54\] <br />Summary Disposition Order Of The Intermediate Court Of Appeals, Filed On September <br />25, 2025 \[Dkt.1\]) <br /> <br />(At this time, Chair Cabanas proceeded to read Items B and C into the record.) <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: I’m assuming “Dkt.” is “Docket”—is that correct? Yes—okay. Thank you <br />very much. <br /> <br />Okay. So we have three communications here—A, B, and C. We, upon advice of our Deputy <br />Attorney General, there is a need for us to have a Board discussion with her in executive session <br />and, therefore, may I have a motion for the Board to go into executive session. <br /> <br />MS. BOND: So moved. <br /> <br />MR. THOMAS: Second. <br /> <br />CHR. CABANAS: Okay—Glynis has provided me with a little clarification that our Director of <br />Human Resources, do you want to give us an update in an open session? Oh, okay—so it’s not <br />the Director, it’s actually the Deputy Attorney General for an update in an open session. Is that <br />correct, Trisha—for you to give an update in an open session or is it— <br />Page 7 <br /> <br /> <br />