Laserfiche WebLink
February 16, 2001 <br />Regular Session Minutes <br />Page 5 <br />Vice Chair Manago stated that Mr. Russi does not want Wood & Tait to be their next investigator, and he <br />wants to come and present that to them. <br />Commissioner Moe stated that the public should have an opportunity to make statements in relationship <br />to that process. <br />Commissioner Mills inquired as to how this matter would be handled on the agenda. <br />Ms. Pelayo stated that it could be placed on the agenda under Committee Reports, Contractual Services. <br />They could state that requests for proposals are being accepted for investigative services. People will be <br />able to make statements on that agenda item. <br />Vice Chair Manago moved that they change from a public hearing to accepting public statements before <br />they come to a decision on the next investigator. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Muller <br />and carried with Commissioner Mills casting a nay vote. <br />EXECUTIVE SESSION <br />Commissioner Manago moved to meet in executive session to consider charges brought against officers <br />of the Hawaii County Police Department where matters affecting privacy will be considered and a closed <br />meeting is requested by individuals involved and to consult with Corporation Counsel on questions and <br />issues pertaining to the commission's powers, duties, privileges, immunities, and liabilities. <br />The commission convened into executive session at 11:20 a.m. and then reconvened back into regular <br />session at 12:45 p.m. <br />ACTION ON EXECUTIVE SESSION MATTERS <br />Corresp. 035, dated February 7, 2001. Complainant in HPC 00 -69 requests a reconsideration of the <br />commission's decision that there was no misconduct on the part of the accused officer. No motion was <br />made. <br />Corresp. 010, dated December 27, 2000, from former Police Officer Joseph T. Garguile requesting legal <br />counsel in Civil No. 00 -1 -0360. Commissioner Mills moved that the officer was acting within the scope of <br />his duties as a police officer and should be afforded legal counsel. The motion was seconded by <br />Commissioner Manago and carried with Commissioners Williams and Muller casting nay votes. <br />Consideration of Complaints against Hawaii County Police Officers <br />HPC 00 -68A & 68B: Complainants filed a harassment complaint and alleged that the officer on the <br />case did not follow -up on a timely manner. Commissioner Williams moved to sustain the complaint. The <br />motion was seconded by Commissioner Muller and unanimously carried. <br />HPC 00 -71A & 71B: Complainants alleged that an officer told untruths and misleading statements <br />when he issued them a citation and displayed partiality and discrimination by not citing another vehicle <br />with a similar violation. Commissioner Williams moved to decline further investigation because there <br />was no misconduct on the part of the accused officer. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hara <br />and unanimously carried. <br />HPC 00 -75: Complainant alleged that an officer yelled and used profanity in the presence of her boys <br />following a minor car accident in a grocery store parking lot. Commissioner Mills moved to decline <br />further investigation because there was no misconduct on the part of the accused officer. The motion <br />was seconded by Commissioner Muller and unanimously carried. <br />