Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Session Minutes <br />April 20, 2001 <br />Page 2 <br />He asked Lincoln Ashida twice, three times to listen to a tape that could shed some light on <br />what happened. He will not. The former prosecutor will not listen to something that could <br />help him make decisions. <br />He filed a complaint with the Consumer Protection Agency in regards to retrieving tax dollars <br />from Wood & Tait. <br />He received a letter from the Mayor who instructed Lincoln Ashida and Wendell Hatada to <br />investigate whether or not Wood & Tait overcharged the public. That was not his complaint. <br />He covered that with Dixie, and he still has not received anything from the Mayor's office in <br />regards to his complaint. This has been his experience with his government. They never <br />address his complaint. They make up their own. Dixie has promised him that she would <br />look into this personally. <br />He asked if the timer is for per correspondence or per person, to which Corporation Counsel <br />Ashida stated it's at the discretion of the Chair. <br />CORPORATION COUNSEL ASHIDA questioned Mr. Russi if he lived close by. Mr. Russi <br />responded that he lived a 15- minute drive away. Mr. Ashida then asked Russi to get the <br />tape, and he would listen to it. He is not refusing to listen to it. He will take the tape back <br />to his office and listen to it. Mr. Russi agreed. <br />CORPORATION COUNSEL ASHIDA further stated, for the record, that he would like to <br />respond to certain claims and allegations that were made by Mr. Russi. First of all, with <br />respect to the OIP, it's this county's position as practice, and this is not negotiable, that they <br />comply with OIP, whether it's an OIP request or everyday business. But as every <br />government employee knows, the rules concerning the Uniform Information Practices Act is <br />subject to interpretation. So, when any citizen makes a request to any of our agencies, it's <br />not always a clear -cut answer whether they can turn it over or not. The practice with this <br />commission, at least in his experience, and what they recommend to all county agencies, is if <br />you are not sure, ask, because if they turn over something to any member of the public that <br />they're not supposed to, and if they get sued, the taxpayers are at risk, their tax dollars are <br />at risk. Mr. Russi made the request, Josie promptly checked with him, and then they made <br />the determination. They acted prudently and swiftly. She did what she was trained to do. <br />She wasn't sure, she checked. It would have been derelict on her part if she just willingly <br />gave out records without checking if she's not sure. The bottom line in this case is that Mr. <br />Russi made a request and it was given to him well within OIP's ten -day guideline. <br />The second thing he'd like to say is that Mr. Russi made reference to the comment <br />attributable to him bringing in trainers from Oahu from the OIP, and he tagged onto that <br />because our government employees are agents, don't know the law, don't know what they're <br />doing. That's absolutely not true. This was in reference to a conversation he had with Mr. <br />Pranke where it was suggested that, they could bring representatives from OIP in to answer <br />any questions or concerns that any county government employee has. It's not because <br />