Laserfiche WebLink
9) Describe any known hazards on the property. <br /> This property contains a relatively short coastline. This coastline is comprised of a cliff <br /> sloping from probably 50 ft. above sea level to possibly 100 ft. above sea level. The area, <br /> perhaps 15 to 20 yards in length, used by the fishermen seems well protected by a raised <br /> rocky boundary. However, all cliffs are dangerous. The upper cliff on the property has a <br /> spectacular view, but might be considered more hazardous in that the ground contours <br /> downward toward the cliff. This hazard would be compounded if wet. There are however <br /> relatively frequent trees in this more hazardous area. E If there were to be youth nearby, it might <br /> be well to consider a cordoned boundary, if necessary with hazard tape. <br /> Investigation will be initiated as to whether the Plantation might have discharged toxic <br /> materials or fluid onto the mauka section of the property over its 100 years of operations. The <br /> initial presumption is that this did not occur as the well known discharge areas were onto <br /> properties west of this nominated property by several hundred yards. I was referred by the <br /> Heritage Center to speak with a lifetime plantation worker now in his mid 80s, but with <br /> excellent memory faculty. He was unable to remember whether dumping occurred below the <br /> cane haul road. It is unknown whether a toxic materials survey will need to be undertaken in <br /> light of the fact that the proposal in this application presumes the presence of youth working <br /> the earth. Caution might be justified in this case. I had been told that a preliminary survey of <br /> substantial area such as this might cost in the neighborhood of$30,000. <br /> Sugg.26-03 <br />