Laserfiche WebLink
Cmr. Ward noted the commission receives suggestions in January and often sends the mayor's <br /> report in December. She called the 11-month lag excessive. Cmr. Chang said the year-end <br /> packaging had been tied to including a final fund accounting, which is not required by code. <br /> She outlined a faster path: final scoring in July,transmit reports in August, and allow the <br /> mayor 60 days, landing in October. <br /> V. Chr. Crivello opposed removing properties from the list unless already protected. She <br /> supported status updates and clearer communication inviting re-nominations. She said scores <br /> vary year to year, but priority can remain comparable. She cautioned against Council removing <br /> items because the commission performs the deep review. <br /> Cmr. Britt proposed a list format that shows preserved properties, separates willing and <br /> unwilling owners, and whether a named nonprofit still exists or remains willing to steward. <br /> V. Chr. Crivello asked for broader community education and Council support to make PONC <br /> approachable. She said visible Council engagement helps nominees and the commission. She <br /> cited a recent nomination with active Council support as a positive model. <br /> Chr. Rosam noted code allows updating the prioritized list at least annually by December 31. <br /> She suggested pushing for earlier updates. <br /> Cmr. Ward suggested twice-yearly submissions. Ms. Kekai said the commission could submit in <br /> July if desired. Cmr. Ward said accepting suggestions twice a year could improve timing, <br /> acknowledging the workload tradeoff.V. Chr. Crivello said the commission must balance <br /> mandates with flexibility. Cmr. Ward believed current rules limit the intake to once a year. V. <br /> Chr. Crivello said the rule sets a minimum, not a cap. <br /> Cmr. Chang addressed "what makes a good property." She said flood zone protection should <br /> not drive PONC buys and that permit controls should address flood risk. She said using PONC <br /> to buy a parking lot for an existing County park misallocates limited funds and could displace <br /> higher value cultural or archaeological sites. <br /> Council Member Galimba agreed and asked who should fund park support. Cmr. Ward added <br /> an example where a County park relies on access over a private road. She questioned policy <br /> alignment. <br /> Cmr. Ward thanked staff for work amid turnover. She reiterated the commission's long- <br /> standing request for dedicated PONC staff. She said she was only recently made aware that <br /> Mr. Hamana Ventura retired. Ms. Kekai said the County created a dedicated PONC program <br /> manager role and it has been filled by Mr. Ben Schapiro. She said the property manager <br /> position was posted. <br /> Cmr. Ward asked for PONC property use policies to guide post-acquisition management. She <br /> said clear policies would inform acquisitions. <br /> Chr. Rosam asked whether Council members read the commission's reports and scores. She <br /> said bulk resolutions made the work feel overlooked. <br /> DRAFT 2-Minutes of November 10, 2025 <br /> Page 16 <br />