My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-11-10 - Minutes DRAFT 2
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Board Packets
>
2026 Meetings
>
02 - March 9, 2026
>
Minutes
>
2025-11-10 - Minutes DRAFT 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2026 11:32:48 AM
Creation date
3/3/2026 11:32:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
amounts requested. They are requesting$32,000 for Maintenance Activities and <br /> $47,000 for Management Planning. <br /> A discussion ensued regarding the application that was submitted to the Department of <br /> Finance. The applicant appeared to realize that the submitted application form was <br /> different from the one they intended to submit. <br /> Cmr. Chang asked about the $10,000 budgeted for native species management. Mr. <br /> Remo said it covered a biologist to develop erosion control, sediment prevention, and <br /> fire protection. Ms. Pascuita added they had worked with community members familiar <br /> with local plants and sought professional guidance, but they did not have quotes. <br /> Cmr. Ward asked about water for a nursery. Ms. Pascuita said water service existed on <br /> site but they had not activated it. Mr. Remo said they found multiple irrigation lines <br /> while clearing cane grass. Ms. Pascuita said they would assess what worked before using <br /> any lines. <br /> Chr. Rosam confirmed the parcel size was about one third of an acre. Ms. Pascuita <br /> agreed and noted it was the smallest property. <br /> Cmr. Goodoni asked about wetlands. Ms. Pascuita said there were none. She said they <br /> planned to survey native species and that descendants had reported species missing <br /> from the area. <br /> Cmr. Ward contrasted day use in the prior application (26-03)with their approach. An <br /> applicant said they had hosted public workshops. Ms. Pascuita said nighttime cultural <br /> use, including fishing, was important and that the seawall enabled access. She said <br /> keeping the area open for cultural practice remained a priority. <br /> V. Chr. Crivello summarized that public access required groundwork first, including <br /> archaeological and ecological understanding and building relationships with <br /> descendants, schools,cultural practitioners, and existing stewards. She noted heavy <br /> tour activity in Keauhou and said foundational access should reconnect community <br /> members who had been displaced. Ms. Pascuita agreed and described workshops that <br /> shared maps and place names to build respect and correct usage. She said broader <br /> outreach used Facebook, Instagram, their website, posters, and radio. <br /> Chr. Rosam asked if the scope was feasible in one year. Ms. Pascuita said outside <br /> support was ready and many tasks were needed. Another applicant representative said <br /> some items like tables were one-time purchases and that workshops, propagation, and <br /> coastal monitoring could proceed. <br /> V. Chr. Crivello asked about AIS timing and ground disturbance. Ms. Pascuita said <br /> DRAFT 2-Minutes of November 10, 2025 <br /> Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.