Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Session Minutes <br />October 25, 2002 <br />Page 3 <br />NEW BUSINESS: None <br />ACTION ON EXECUTIVE SESSION MATTERS <br />• Correspondence 65, request for legal counsel by Officer Mark Farias in Civil No. <br />02 -1 -0149. Commissioner Manago moved to approve legal counsel as the officer acted <br />within the course and scope of his duties. Vice Chair Hara seconded the motion, and it <br />carried unanimously. <br />Consideration and Investigation of Complaints <br />Complaint HPC 01 -51: Review of Akal's investigation of complainant's allegations that <br />police officers refused to take his report and always hang up on him. <br />Commissioner Manago moved to exonerate Officer #1 on the charges of Standard of <br />Conduct, Performance of Duty, and Duty to Report all Offenses. Vice Chair Hara <br />seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. <br />Commissioner Manago moved to exonerate Officer #2 on the charges of Standard of <br />Conduct, Performance of Duty, and Duty to Report all Offenses. Commissioner Muller <br />seconded the motion, and it unanimously carried. <br />Commissioner Lambeth moved to exonerate Officer #3 on the charges of Standard of <br />Conduct, Performance of Duty, and Duty to Report all Offenses. Commissioner Manago <br />seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. <br />Complaint HPC 02 -34: Complainant alleged that an officer scolded and blamed her for <br />her son's bad behavior. She also alleged that he yelled at her. Vice Chair Hara moved to <br />refer the complaint to the Chief because it concerns administrative matters. <br />Commissioner Lambeth seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. <br />Complaint HPC 02 -35: Complainant alleged that while directing traffic, an officer spoke <br />to her in an arrogant and unprofessional manner. Commissioner Lambeth moved to refer <br />the complaint to the Chief because it concerns administrative matters. The motion was <br />seconded by Vice Chair Hara and unanimously carried. <br />Complaint HPC 02 -36: Complainant alleged that an officer should not have sought a <br />search warrant for their medical marijuana and violated many departmental rules during <br />the arrest. <br />Complaint HPC 02 -37: (Same incident as HPC 02 -36.) Complainant alleged that the <br />officer is responsible for the conduct of his subordinate; and that during their arrest, he <br />did not show professionalism and was overbearing. <br />Complaint HPC 02 -38: (Same incident as HPC 02 -36.) Complainant alleged that an <br />officer violated many department rules during their arrest. <br />