My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-07-18 Police Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Police Department
>
Police Commission
>
Minutes
>
2001 - 2009
>
2003
>
2003-07-18 Police Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 8:10:39 AM
Creation date
6/16/2011 11:54:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Police Commission <br />Regular Session Minutes <br />July 18, 2003 <br />Page 6 <br />deliberation. Thinking out loud he asked if there were any issues with having an I.A. <br />detective present when an officer gave a statement to the commission in closed <br />session. The law states that so long as that person can assist the commission. <br />Captain Tavares stated that they would have to give the officer Garrity and advise him <br />of his rights. Corporation Counsel Ashida stated that it is made clear in Josie's letter to <br />the officer that his statement is voluntary. The officer doesn't have to show up. <br />Detective Yamamoto recommended that the commission use other terms when <br />informing the complainant and the accused officer of the commission's decision. <br />Conflict might occur when they do an investigation and do not concur with the <br />commission's decision. Detective O'Connor stated that an example is if the <br />commission exonerated an officer. They review every report that comes to their <br />office. They might find a problem and do an investigation. Through their investigation, <br />they might find that a violation had been committed and then send it to the ARB. The <br />union could grieve that the officer had already been exonerated. Now, they are looking <br />at a double jeopardy issue. He suggested that the commission change its verbiage <br />and could include, "We're going to send it to the chief for further action." <br />Vice Chair Manago stated that verbiage is very important, and that they need to take a <br />look at sustained, not sustained, exonerated, and unfounded. The Honolulu Police <br />Commission has only three categories -- exonerate, sustain, and not sustain. <br />Commissioner Bertsch suggested that they change the wording to "has merit" and "has <br />no merit." <br />• Status report of complaints referred to Akal. <br />CRAIG FUJIHARA stated that he is from the Honolulu office of Akal and oversees the <br />investigations. He will be e- mailing a status report to Josie every Friday. He will also <br />send a bi- weekly report with the amount of hours and a monthly report. <br />Commissioner Frazier stated that he didn't get much out of the report, and would like to <br />work on it. Commissioner de Silva asked that they add the date of the incident, the <br />date received by the investigator, and the planned completion date. Commission <br />Bertsch asked if all that information -- weekly, bi- weekly, and monthly reports were <br />necessary. <br />Al Bee introduced himself as Akal's new investigator for the Police Commission. He <br />retired from the Honolulu Police Department after 26 years. He was a motorcycle <br />officer, vice officer, and detective. He retired in 1991 as a lieutenant watch commander <br />in Kalihi. He spent the last four years as a law enforcement officer at the Hilo <br />International Airport. He moved to the Big Island because he had property in <br />Kurtistown. He has friends who are retired police officers at the airport, but he doesn't <br />socialize with police officers here. He gave Ms. Pelayo his resume. <br />Commissioner Bertsch asked that Mr. Yamasaki and Mr. Chun return their police <br />identification. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.