Laserfiche WebLink
Hawaii County Police Commission <br />Regular Session Minutes <br />January 16, 2004 <br />Page 5 <br />Commissioner de Silva stated that Commissioner Bertsch did a good job on the flowchart but <br />did not put it in written policy form which he had requested at the previous meeting. When <br />this is done, they should also prepare a narrative to the Mayor and Managing Director <br />explaining the commission's oversight function and problems they have had with prior <br />administrations. <br />Vice Chair Manago stated that he has reservations about the flowchart. It is like having the <br />wolf watching the hen house. When the commission was originally setup, it was an <br />independent group of people representing the community to oversee the Police Department. <br />Having the Police Commission use an arm of the department (IA) to investigate its officers, <br />takes away the commission's independence from the Police Department. <br />Commissioner Lambeth expressed concern that there have been times when an officer's <br />statement to them was different from the statement given to IA. <br />Vice Chair Manago clarified his interpretation of the flowchart. The flowchart showed that <br />they would be using Internal Affairs, which is an arm of the police department, to investigate <br />officer misconduct, instead of a private investigator. The Police Commission was set up to be <br />a completely independent group of people representing the community. When complainants <br />file a complaint it is important that they know that the Police Department has nothing to do <br />with the investigation. <br />Commissioner de Silva stated that the people that are doing the actual investigation that the <br />Administrative Review Board is going to listen to, are the ones who do it last, and that is the <br />Internal Affairs Unit. If they're going to investigate anyway, the commission should let them <br />do it. The commission could then review the investigation to see if it needs any <br />supplementation. This would serve a dual purpose, one to eliminate unnecessary expense <br />and time and the second to perform an oversight function over the quality of the work of the <br />IAU. He has questions about the IAU and ARB procedures. He suggested that they ask the <br />department to provide them with all the files for the past year of the ARB procedures so that <br />they could see for themselves what is in the files. The commission would have more of an <br />opportunity to see that there's fairness if they do it last. He wants to be sure that the IAU is <br />doing a fair and unbiased job, and the commission can't tell that if they do a secret <br />investigation. <br />Chair Hara stated that he would like to see a clear delineation between the department's <br />investigation and the commission's investigation. As a citizen, he would like to have his case <br />heard entirely by citizens rather than by the department, who if they wanted to, could skew <br />the findings. There is that suspicion. <br />Chair Hara asked Commissioners de Silva and Bertsch of the rules and policies committee to <br />prepare the written procedures. <br />Commissioner de Silva suggested that they have a special meeting to continue working on <br />the procedures. <br />