Laserfiche WebLink
Hawaii County Police Commission <br />Regular Session Minutes <br />March 14, 2008 <br />Page 4 <br />Corporation Counsel before the seven days in order for him to make a recommendation to <br />the commission. Currently, there is no time limit. <br />The recent warrant sweep was a joint task force with participation from all counties. A <br />grant was used to pay for some of the costs. They will be conducting these types of <br />operations more often. <br />STATEMENTS ON COMPLAINTS (open to the public) <br />JENNY KRAUS (COMPLAINT HPC 07 -055) stated that she hears about harassment all the <br />time from the kids. Officer Castillo came by and told the kids, "I told you before no <br />skateboarding on the sidewalk." She told the officer it was not illegal to sit or carry a <br />skateboard. They were her kids, and they were outside her shop. She told him she had her <br />rights and asked him to leave her shop. He went outside and told her son that he saw him <br />skateboarding, and that he should have given him a ticket. She talked to Officer Kagimoto at <br />the station, and he told her it was not illegal to carry or sit on a skateboard. Two of her sons <br />and her niece were outside her shop sitting on their skateboard. They were not blocking the <br />way. They were probably riding their skateboard on the sidewalk that day. She has been <br />working with Officer Derr about the skateboarders. They are trying to get them a park and <br />getting them off the street. The first offense is a $25, not $40 as the officer stated. <br />Vice Chair Whittemore stated that his son used to skateboard, and he used to get calls about <br />it. When he was in the private business, they used to post signs that skateboarding was not <br />allowed. The kids need to know what areas allow skateboarding and stay within the law. <br />Corporation Counsel Ashida stated that after reading the officer's report, he was concerned <br />about obstruction of the sidewalk. <br />KRAUS stated that there were three kids, and their knees were crunched up. They were not <br />blocking the sidewalk. <br />KENNETH LONG (HPC 08 -04) stated that he is concerned about the unprofessional <br />behavior of the officer when he presented the citation. He didn't tell him why he was stopped <br />until after he wrote up the citation. He tried to develop a communication, but the officer didn't <br />want to discuss it. When he asked to see the laser, the officer said he did not have time. So, <br />there was no evidence. He wanted to discuss the scenario. He accelerated along with the <br />line of traffic. He had to speed up when he pulled out and got into the line of traffic. The 45 <br />mph speed limits are illegal and are being used for speed traps by officers. The speed limit <br />signs are irrational. They don't follow federal guidelines. The state has not make traffic <br />studies since 1987. He thinks when the officer saw his California driver's license, he thought <br />"slam dunk." His insurance rate will increase. He was going 65 mph when he was pulled <br />over. He was going with the flow of traffic. He believes the speed limit should be 60 mph. <br />Corporation Counsel Ashida stated that they do not have enough members to vote for an <br />executive session. Quorum vote would be six. However, they could still move forward if they <br />felt they had enough information. <br />