Laserfiche WebLink
Hawaii County Police Commission <br />Regular Session Minutes <br />February 20, 2009 <br />Page 5 <br />INVESTIGATION OF COMPLAINTS: STATEMENTS ON COMPLAINTS <br />OFFICER JAMES WAIAMAU (Complaint HPC 09 -06) stated that that morning he was <br />proceeding to work in Kona when he was struck by another vehicle. His vehicle was left <br />on the oncoming lane, so he took it off the road. He contacted the owner of the property, <br />out of courtesy, not that he had done that to her property. He told her that officers were <br />contacted and would be coming. Shortly thereafter Officer Castillo came to the scene. <br />After looking at the scene, the officer made an assessment. The complainant claims that <br />accidents there only happen on one side of the road. He believes it happens on both sides <br />of the road. The only information he conveyed to her was that a vehicle had struck her <br />fence. His vehicle never struck the fence. There was white paint on his vehicle from the <br />other vehicle. He was in the middle of the road. It was raining. He moved his vehicle to <br />the side because he didn't want to create a hazardous situation. Officer Castillo was at the <br />scene the whole time and officially did the report. The site was inventoried. He doesn't <br />know if the other vehicle left debris. He was shaken up. His car was never by the fence. <br />He believes the other vehicle struck the fence. In response to Chair Whittemore's inquiry <br />into whether there could have been a more thorough investigation, Officer Waiamau stated <br />that he couldn't say what was done because he was not the investigating officer. <br />EVA KERR (Complaint HPC 09 -06) stated that her allegation is that the report is <br />fraudulent, and there is collusion on the part of all three officers — the officer who was <br />involved, the investigating officer, and the acting sergeant. Mr. Waiamau's accident was <br />number five. Every accident that occurred on her fence line occurred at exactly the same <br />spot, cars going up Kaumana. She is challenging the White Cherokee. The responding <br />officer never once asked her questions. She showed parts left behind from Officer <br />Waiamau's car and part of the fence. <br />RICHARD CONRADT, KERR'S SON (Complaint HPC 09 -06) showed a photo of the <br />accident scene. He stated that Officers Castillo and Waiamau said the accident occurred <br />where there was no evidence. They are not there for money, but because the <br />investigation was not done properly. There name was not on the report. Officer Tolentino <br />took their name but it was not on the report. All accidents that occurred had to be towed <br />away. Officer Waiamau's car had to be towed away. The white Cherokee drove away. <br />They just want this to be investigated properly. He believes Officer Waiamau gave an <br />untrue statement. They put out a report that the area is hazardous. Since then the county <br />has corrected the roadway. The county has acknowledged that this roadway is a problem. <br />OFFICER DARRYL CASTILLO (Complaint HPC 09 -06) stated that the accident happened <br />in May 2008. Sometime late last year, the police RMS system went down, and they lost <br />master names, and names were not linked up. Office Waiamau was going up Saddle <br />Road. He said he was heading west when a white Cherokee struck his vehicle, and he <br />spun out. Officer Waiamau moved his vehicle to the other side, the north side. There was <br />debris. He did not determine where the debris came from; he didn't have the time to do it. <br />He helped officer Waiamau transfer his firearms, clothing, etc. to his car. He had minimal <br />conversation with Kerr or Conradt. He did not tell her that the county would pay for her <br />broken fence. The complainants spoke to Sergeants Tolentino and Gali. All the evidence <br />correlated with Officer Waiamau's statement. He wondered why the name was not on the <br />