My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2026-03-09 - Minutes DRAFT 1
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Board Packets
>
2026 Meetings
>
03 - May 11, 2026
>
Minutes
>
2026-03-09 - Minutes DRAFT 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2026 10:36:24 AM
Creation date
5/4/2026 10:36:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />adjoining property. He said that, based on that boundary change, he believed the heiau <br />was no longer located on the property being nominated. <br /> <br />d. Sugg. 26-04, Hīlea, Kaū, ʻHawai‘i <br />TMK: (3) 9-5-018:001 <br /> <br />LORI-LEE LORENZO, Field Coordinator – The Nature Conservancy, testified in support of <br />the nomination. <br /> <br />NOHEALANI KAʻAWA, tes?fied in support of the nomina?on. <br /> <br />CHRISTIAN GIARDINA, testified in support of the nomination. <br /> <br />JOHN REPLOGLE, testified in support of the nomination. <br /> <br />IKAIKA GRACE, testified in support of the nomination. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER DISCLOSURE: <br />*Before additional testimony was taken on Sugg. 26-04, Chr. Chang noted that Cmr. <br />Rosam wished to make an announcement. Cmr. Rosam stated, for disclosure <br />purposes, that she works for The Nature Conservancy, but that she had been very <br />strict about not participating in the application process. She stated that she did not <br />believe she had any conflicts specifically. In response, V. Chr. Britt asked whether Cmr. <br />Rosam was currently working there, and Cmr. Rosam confirmed that she was. V. Chr. <br />Britt noted that she had worked for The Nature Conservancy for 20 years, though not <br />here. Cmr. Rosam further stated that, if the acquisition were to go through, it would <br />not financially benefit her in any way, shape, or form.* <br /> <br />SHALAN CRYSDALE, Director – The Nature Conservancy (Nominator), testified in support <br />of the nomination. <br /> <br />V. Chr. Britt asked about the current listing price for the property. Nominator Shalan <br />Crysdale responded that the property was not listed and stated that he did not feel it <br />was in his best interest to disclose the price at that time. He stated, however, that the <br />nominators had received $2 million from the Legacy Land Fund. <br /> <br />Chr. Chang asked how long the Legacy Land Fund monies would remain available. Mr. <br />Crysdale responded that he did not know the answer with certainty because the parties <br />were still in the signing process, but stated that the nominators had advised the State <br />that they were undergoing a title search that could take as long as two years, and that <br />the landowner was aware of that timeline. <br /> <br />Cmr. Markoff asked whether the property owner was willing to sell the property. Mr. <br />Crysdale responded that the matter had progressed to the point where The Nature <br />Conservancy might receive a letter of intent giving it a right of first refusal before a sale. <br />Cmr. Markoff then commented that the application would be stronger with fuller <br />disclosure regarding price, partnerships, and available funding, particularly because the <br />application gives favorable priority to properties with partner funding. Mr. Crysdale <br />DRAFT v.1 BS - Minutes of March 9, 2026 <br />Page 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.