Laserfiche WebLink
supported by written findings of fact and conclusions of law. 17 See In re <br /> Hawaii Electric Light Compan Inc., 60 Haw. 625, 641-643, 594 P.2d 612, 623- <br /> 624 (1979); In re Terminal Transportation Inc., 54 Haw. 134, 139, 504 P.2d <br /> 1214, 121 (1972); Kilauea Neighborhood Association v. Land Use Commission, 7 <br /> Haw. App. 227, 232, 751 P.2d 1031, 1035 (1988). <br /> More on the "Rosehill Cases" <br /> 44. In late September of 2022, five months after this Court <br /> rendered its decision in 3CCV-21-0000178 and in advance of the hearing that <br /> was scheduled on the petitions before the Appellee Board of Appeals, the <br /> Appellants Ford, et al. filed a motion with the Appellee Board of Appeals to <br /> exclude any reference to the "Rosehill Cases" (Dkt. 28, JEFS page 21, ROA <br /> 426-428; Dkt. 29, JEFS page 1, ROA 429-452; Dkt. 30, JEFS page 1, ROA <br /> 453-475; Dkt. 31, JEFS page 1, ROA 476-479) because (a) unlike the land in <br /> the "Rosehill Cases," the subject land in question is located in a county-based <br /> Agricultural Project District and the county Zoning Code regulates the use of <br /> land within such a district, (b) neither the parties nor the circuit court in the <br /> "Rosehill Cases" addressed the soil productivity rating class of the land that the <br /> "Rosehill" parties owned, (c) the State Land Use Commission determines what <br /> is a "compatible" use when the soil productivity rating is Class C and (d) that <br /> the commission had actually found in the "Rosehill Cases" that the use of a <br /> "farm dwelling" in the State Land Use Agriculture District for short-term <br /> vacation rental purposes is not a "compatible" or direct permitted use in the <br /> district. is <br /> 17 "The agency shall notify the parties to the proceeding by <br /> delivering or mailing a certified copy of the decision and order and <br /> accompanying findings and conclusions within a reasonable time to each <br /> party or' to the party' s attorney of record. " The Board' s own Rule 3- <br /> 18 states that "The board shall render a written decision and order in <br /> every contested case, which shall include separate findings of fact <br /> and conclusions of law." <br /> 18 See Part D.12 to D.16, Pages 30 to 31, infra, for further <br /> discussion. Also, as is stated above, on September 24, 2024, the <br /> 16 <br />