Laserfiche WebLink
Ninole, HI 96773 <br /> TMK 3-2-002-111 Alla Pruglo 7515 Mariposa Ave. <br /> Citrus Heights, CA 95610 <br /> TMK 3-2-002-112 Christie Guastella& John 11232 River Highlands Dr. <br /> Payne Saint Amant, LA 70774 <br /> TMK 3-2-002-113 Frances Santa Maria Trust 1911 Kalanianole Ave., Unit 205 <br /> Hilo, HI, 96720 <br /> TMK 3-2-002-114 Mary and Daniel Lock 913 Hog Back Rd. <br /> Haiku, HI, 96708 <br /> TMK 3-2-002-115 Mathew Jackson and Debra 17835 Beard Ln. <br /> Bruno Huntington Beach, CA 92647 <br /> TMK 3-2-002-035 Nikoly Pruglo2 7515 Mariposa Ave. <br /> Citrus Heights, CA 95610 <br /> III. BACKGROUND <br /> SUB 05-00064 concerned a 48.47 acre parcel and a non-contiguous .699 acre parcel <br /> identified prior to SUB 05-00064 as TMK 3-2-002-035, all of which is in the agricultural district <br /> and zoned A-20a. On June 2, 2004, the Planning Director issued a determination of pre-existing <br /> lots on the 48.47 acre parcel and stated that there were only two legal lots of 26.37 and 22.7 acres <br /> each. He said, "Old plantation houses [sic] locations do not create legal lots of record." Exhibit <br /> "A". The property was sold. <br /> On April 7, 2005, a Consolidation and Resubdivision Application, SUB 05-00064, was <br /> submitted to the Planning Department.3 Changing positions from the June 2, 2004 preexisting lot <br /> determination, on June 1,2005,the Planning Director granted tentative approval of the preliminary <br /> plat map.4 On July 1, 2005, a final plat map was submitted dividing the larger, 48.7 acre, parcel <br /> 2 There is a roadway lot, TMK No. 3-2-002-116 owned by Home Tech Construction, 7515 <br /> Mariposa Ave, Citrus Heights, CA 95610. <br /> 3 The documents use SUB 05-000064, SUB 05-00064, and Sub. 05-0064. They are the <br /> same permit. <br /> 4 Apparently, the Director was convinced of the eligibility of the parcels for preexisting lot <br /> status based on a Planning Director letter in 2000. This letter was missing from County files until <br /> mysteriously rediscovered after the SUB 05-00064 applicant purchased the property. See Molfino <br /> v. Yuen, 134 Haw. 181, 339 P.3d 679 (Haw. 2014). <br /> 3 <br />