Laserfiche WebLink
Petitioner further asked what additional requirements or standards would have been <br /> required had SUB 05-00064 not been a consolidation and resubdivision.The Director stated,"[t]he <br /> additional requirements would have been determined in the subdivision process and cannot be <br /> definitively stated because this subdivision did not go through the full normal process under <br /> Section 23-7. Generally,it would have required a county water system and an agricultural standard <br /> road,unless variances were obtained." Exhibit"C". <br /> SUB 05-00064 divided the 48.47 parcel into six lots while retaining the non-contiguous <br /> .699 acre portion of TMK 3-2-002-035 as an independent lot of record, in and of itself. <br /> The current tax map shows: <br /> -71 per; <br /> OW <br /> 35.� <br /> Its <br /> tip- <br /> 7 <br /> "---�- ^.... �.�, � .emu r„y,.. zf- J'�.�-.h4� w"`"^• <br /> Lots 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, and 35 all exist within the 48.47 acre parcel. This is more <br /> lots than existed before SUB 05-00064. <br /> 5 <br /> 8 <br />