Laserfiche WebLink
II <br /> 5. Section 23-76.No conveyance of land prior to approval for recordation. <br /> Given Director Yuen's concession that SUB 05-00064 was approved by mistake <br /> relative to the resulting subdivision creating more lots than were alleged to have <br /> preexisted, thereby failing to qualify for the purported 23-7 or 25-2-11 exemption <br /> from the provisions of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes, what steps, if any, does <br /> the Director intend to take to prevent the further conveyance of SUB 05-00064 lots? <br /> 6. Section 23-84. It is unclear whether this section applies to the Pruglo Lots <br /> and whether a water system, including water mains and fire hydrants, are required <br /> to be built. <br /> 7. Section 23-85. It is unclear whether this section requires development of a <br /> sewer system or what minimum requirements are required for sewage disposal on <br /> the Pruglo Lots. <br /> 8. Section 23-95. It is unclear whether thePruglo <br /> rug o Lots developer is required <br /> to improve the street rights of way and whether the roadway improvements conform <br /> to the standard specifications on file with the department of public works. <br /> Furthermore, in a letter dated June 1, 2005, from Director Yuen to planning <br /> consultant Sidney Fuke, the Director stated that Access to the subdivision from <br /> the Mamalahoa Highway is via an existing access easement (P-30-A) on private <br /> properties. Confirm rights of access over and across this easement."The subdivider <br /> provided evidence that others have the right to pass through the subdivider's <br /> property, but in seventeen years of litigation, was unable to provide any <br /> documentation of possessing P-30-A easement through <br /> ou petitioner Kellber s <br /> p g g p g <br /> How does property. thi 1 k s lack of recorded access easement impact development <br /> permit approvals? <br /> 9. Section 25-2-1. Duties of countyofficers. Given the mandatory " <br /> shall <br /> enforce all other provisions of this chapter pertaining to land use", what steps, if <br /> any, does the Director intend to initiate to bring SUB 05-00064, and/or, the lots <br /> created thereby, into compliance with Chapters 23 and 25 of the HCC? <br /> 10. Section 25-2-2. It is unclear whether the Pruglo Lots are eligible for other <br /> development permits or licenses in light of the nonconformance of the Pruglo Lots <br /> with Chapter 25. <br /> 11. Section 25-2-11. The Director conferred with the director of public works <br /> and the manager-chief engineer of the department of water supply under the <br /> misapprehension that SUB 05-00064 was the consolidation of six lots,resubdivided <br /> into six lots. Absent the proper context, it is unclear whether those agencies have <br /> power to impose conditions on future development permits and licenses for the <br /> Pruglo Lots. <br /> 12. Section 25-2-30. Violations. Since the Pruglo Lots do not comply with <br /> Chapter 25, it is unclear whether such failure to comply is a current violation of <br /> Chapter 25. <br /> 10 <br /> 13 <br />