My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-05-28 PL-BOA-2024-000104 Petition (Coupe Order)_v1
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2024-000104 1250 Oceanside, LLC (PD)
>
2024-05-28 PL-BOA-2024-000104 Petition (Coupe Order)_v1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2024 9:42:14 AM
Creation date
5/29/2024 9:41:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Coupe filed its Initial Petition on February 7, 2024, and its Supplemental Petition on <br /> March 27, 2024. Exhibit 2; Exhibit 3. In the interim, Oceanside's Petition was filed on February <br /> 28, 2024 ("Oceanside's Petition"). On April 29, 2024, the Planning Director issued separate <br /> Declaratory Orders on both Coupe's Petitions and Oceanside's Petition. The Declaratory Order <br /> on Oceanside's Petition is the subject of a separate appeal filed concurrently with this appeal. <br /> V. LEGAL STANDARD <br /> The BOA has the power to reverse, modify, or remand a decision by the Planning <br /> Director if the BOA finds that the decision is: <br /> (1) In violation of the Code or other applicable law; or <br /> (2) Clearly erroneous in view of the reliable,probative, and substantial evidence on the <br /> whole record; or <br /> (3) Arbitrary, or capricious, or characterized by an abuse of discretion or clearly <br /> unwarranted exercise of discretion. <br /> BOA Rule 8-15; see also BOA Rule 8-13 (BOA "shall render its decision in an appeal <br /> proceeding,by either affirming the decision appealed from, or reversing or modifying the <br /> decision, or remanding the case to the Director for further proceedings and action."). <br /> VI. ANALYSIS <br /> A. The Planning Director Erred in Ruling that Ordinance No. 96-7 Requires the <br /> Dedication of the Mauka Haleki`i Extension, Makai Haleki`i Extension and <br /> Connector Road. <br /> In the Declaratory Order, the Planning Director ruled that"[t]aken in their entirety, the <br /> Ordinances' roadway and public access requirements expressly require the Mauka Halekii <br /> Extension, Makai Halekii Extension and Connector Road to be dedicated to the County." <br /> Exhibit 1 at 11-12 (emphasis added). To the extent that the Planning Director's ruling <br /> interpreted Ordinance No. 96-7 as requiring the dedication of Mauka Haleki`i Extension, Makai <br /> Haleki`i Extension, and Connector Road, his ruling was in error. <br /> 10 <br /> 4896-1786-4893.1.051730-00058 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.