My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-05-28 PL-BOA-2024-000104 Coupe Order Exhibits COMBINED_v1
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2024-000104 1250 Oceanside, LLC (PD)
>
2024-05-28 PL-BOA-2024-000104 Coupe Order Exhibits COMBINED_v1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2024 11:13:58 AM
Creation date
5/29/2024 10:05:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(1) A non-refundable filing and processing fee of one hundred dollars; <br /> (2) Name, address, telephone number,if available, and signature of each petitioner; <br /> (3) A designation of the specific provision,rule, or order in question, together with a <br /> statement of the controversy or uncertainty involved; and <br /> (4) A statement of the petitioner's position or contention; and <br /> (5) A memorandum of authorities, containing a full discussion of reasons and legal <br /> authorities in support of such position or contention. <br /> The declaratory ruling procedure is one "whereby an interested party could seek agency <br /> advice as to how a statute, agency rule, or order would apply to particular circumstances not yet <br /> determined." Citizens Against Reckless Development v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City and <br /> County of Honolulu ("CARD"), 114 Hawai`i 184, 197, 159 P.3d 143, 156 (2007). "Use of the <br /> declaratory ruling procedural device only makes sense where the applicability of relevant law is <br /> unknown, either because the agency has not yet acted upon particular factual circumstances, or <br /> for some other reason the applicability of some provisions of law have not been brought into <br /> consideration." Id. [T]he declaratory ruling procedure was not intended to be utilized to seek <br /> review of agency determinations that have already been made and which have not been timely <br /> appealed." Id., 114 Hawaii at 196, 159 P.3d at 155. <br /> III. ANALYSIS; RULING <br /> A. Petitioner's Request <br /> The Petition requests the Director to issue a declaratory ruling as to the following <br /> questions: <br /> 1. Determine whether the Planning Director has the authority to determine—under <br /> the HRS, Hawaii Charter, County Code, and the Development Agreement—whether Oceanside <br /> is currently in compliance with the terms of the Development Agreement. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.