2024-09-18 Planning Director Exhibit List (PL-BOA-2024-000104)

Home

The original Petition did not satisfy Planning Rule 3-2's requirements because it contained only a one-sentence request for a hearing without any of the required supporting material or reasoning. Petitioner supplemented its request by letters dated February 13, 2024, and April 25, 2004. Petitioner states a public hearing is "necessary to protect the rights of interested persons and to ensure a consistent disposition of all the issues presented across the three filings." Pet.'s April 24, 2024-letter. Petitioner did not give any clear indication of how the"rights of interested persons"will be protected by a public hearing aside from their statement that "a public airing of the issues will provide Planning Director with a fulsome appreciation of the facts on the ground." Id. Petitioner has had ample opportunity to provide the Director with any material or information which Petitioner feels is missing from the extensive existing written record, including Petitioner's own Petition and exhibits. Thus, the Director finds Petitioner has failed to establish why a public hearing, including presentations by the competing teams of attorneys of the information, history, and arguments found in the Petition and Oceanside's Petition, is necessary to permit the fair and expeditious disposition of the Petition, Given the extensive written records on this matter, the well documented Petition and the Oceanside Petition concurrently under the Director's review, Petitioner's request for a public hearing pursuant Planning Rule 3-2 is denied. Pursuant to Planning Rule 3-6, this Order shall not be applicable to different factual situations or where additional facts not considered in this Order exist. So Ordered, April 29, 2024 Zendo kern Zendo Kern;Apr 29,2024 15:26 HST) ZENDO KERN, PLANNING DIRECTOR 13 EXHIBIT A 906