Laserfiche WebLink
conveying the Bypass to the County." County of Hawaii v. C&J Coupe Fam. Limited. <br /> Partnership, 124 Haw. 281, 297, 242 P.3d 1136, 1152 (2010). The Hawai`i Supreme Court <br /> rightly rejected Coupe's argument, finding that there was sufficient evidence to "support a <br /> conclusion that the Bypass satisfied a broad public use of alleviating traffic congestion in the <br /> area, rather than to simply confer a wholly private benefit to Oceanside." Id. at 299, 242 <br /> P.3d at 1154 (emphasis added). Undoubtedly, the countless residents of the Kona region that <br /> regularly use the Mamalohoa By-Pass would agree with that seemingly self-evident conclusion. <br /> IV. CONCLUSION <br /> Oceanside does not generally oppose Coupe's request to intervene in this appeal. <br /> However, Coupe's Petition raises concerns about Coupe's participation in this appeal and <br /> whether Coupe will seek to unnecessarily complicate or distract from these proceedings. <br /> Oceanside hopes that is not the case. <br /> DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, July 15, 2024. <br /> /s/Derek B. Simon <br /> PATRICK K. WONG <br /> DEREK B. SIMON <br /> IAN WESLEY-SMITH <br /> Attorneys for <br /> 1250 OCEANSIDE, LLC <br /> 4885-9189-8831.1.051730- 000587 <br />