My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-10-04 C&J Coupe Pre-Hearing Brief (PL-BOA-2024-000104 & 105)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2024-000104 1250 Oceanside, LLC (PD)
>
2024-10-04 C&J Coupe Pre-Hearing Brief (PL-BOA-2024-000104 & 105)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2024 8:54:51 AM
Creation date
10/7/2024 9:10:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I. INTRODUCTION <br /> 1250 OCEANSIDE, LLC ("Oceanside") brings this appeal before the Board of Appeals <br /> to overturn the Planning Director's decision made pursuant to two separate Petitions for <br /> Declaratory Ruling: one submitted by Intervenor on February 7, 2024, which was subsequently <br /> supplemented on March 27, 2024, (collectively the "Coupe Petition") and one submitted by <br /> Oceanside on February 28, 2024 ("Oceanside Petition"). <br /> The Planning Director responded to both the Coupe Petition and Oceanside Petition on <br /> April 29, 2024, in separate Declaratory Orders (respectively, Docket No. 24-0001 and Docket <br /> No 24-0002, and collectively the "Orders"). Oceanside, in turn, appealed both Orders creating <br /> two separate matters, PL-BOA-2024-000104, for its appeal of the Director's decision regarding <br /> the Coupe Petition, and PL-BOA-2024-000105, for its appeal of the Director's decision <br /> regarding the Oceanside Petition. PL-BOA-2024-000105 and PL-BOA-2024-000104 were later <br /> consolidated into this appeal upon stipulation by the parties (the "Appeal"). <br /> On the surface, Oceanside's Appeal seeks to have the Board of Appeals ("BOA") <br /> reevaluate the Director's determinations in his Orders, specifically to address questions that <br /> Oceanside claims were erroneously UN-addressed as well as overturn ones that they allege were <br /> erroneously addressed. However, in reality they stand for more than just an innocent developer's <br /> attempts to understand its twenty-five year old obligation. Rather, what is truly on display is <br /> Oceanside's continued efforts to fight tooth and nail, and at every level, against a known and <br /> well understood, multiple decade long obligation to provide the public with unfettered access <br /> through its residential community known as Hokulia("Hokulia"). <br /> Oceanside continues to complicate what is and should be a simple case: over a quarter <br /> century ago, Oceanside promised to design, build, and dedicate important public infrastructure to <br /> 878079 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.