My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-10-04 1250 Oceanside LLC Consolidated Hearing Brief (PL-BOA-2024-000104 & 105)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2024-000104 1250 Oceanside, LLC (PD)
>
2024-10-04 1250 Oceanside LLC Consolidated Hearing Brief (PL-BOA-2024-000104 & 105)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2024 8:52:33 AM
Creation date
10/7/2024 9:10:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Details on each Request the Planning Director failed to answer or rule upon are set forth <br /> below. The BOA should remand this matter back to the Planning Director to modify the <br /> Oceanside Order and issue the declaratory rulings requested by Oceanside, or do so itself. <br /> 1. Dedication Requirements, Request 1. <br /> Dedication Requirements, Request 1 asked"[w]hether the express terms of Ordinance <br /> No. 96-7 require the dedication of the Mauka Haleki`i Extension, Makai Haleki`i Extension, or <br /> Connector Road[.]" Ex. 105-2 at 13. The answer to this Request is no. Id. at 16-17. <br /> The word"dedicate" (or any variation thereof) appears nowhere in Ordinance No. 96-7. <br /> See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Omiya, 142 Hawai`i 439, 449, 420 P.3d 370, 380 (2018) ("where <br /> the statutory language is unambiguous, our duty is to give effect to its plain and obvious <br /> meaning."). Nor does Ordinance No. 96-7 incorporate by reference any of the requirements of <br /> Ordinance No. 96-8. Ex. 105-3. Simply put, there is no requirement under the unambiguous <br /> terms of Ordinance No. 96-7 that these roadways be dedicated to the County. <br /> 2. Dedication Requirements, Request 2. <br /> Dedication Requirements, Request 2 asked"[w]hether the express terms of Ordinance <br /> No. 96-8 require the dedication of the Mauka Haleki`i Extension, Makai Haleki`i Extension, or <br /> Connector Road by a date certain or any milestone in the development of Hokuli`a[.]" Ex. 105-2 <br /> at 13. The answer to this Request is no. Id. at 17. <br /> Ordinance No. 96-8 does not contain any deadline or development milestone for the <br /> dedication of the Makai Haleki`i Extension, Mauka Haleki`i Extension, or Connector Road. See <br /> Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 142 Hawaii at 449, 420 P.3d at 380 ("where the statutory language is <br /> unambiguous, our duty is to give effect to its plain and obvious meaning."). Ordinance No. 96-8 <br /> provides only that the "roadway improvements stated in Condition L of this ordinance shall be <br /> dedicated to the County of Hawaii." Ex. 105-4 at 26. <br /> 4881-6366-3335.6.051730-00058 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.