My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-10-04 1250 Oceanside LLC Consolidated Hearing Brief (PL-BOA-2024-000104 & 105)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2024-000104 1250 Oceanside, LLC (PD)
>
2024-10-04 1250 Oceanside LLC Consolidated Hearing Brief (PL-BOA-2024-000104 & 105)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2024 8:52:33 AM
Creation date
10/7/2024 9:10:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
So long as a roadway is otherwise in compliance with Chapter 23, it can be dedicated to <br /> the County under HCC § 23-10, notwithstanding that it has been granted a variance from HCC § <br /> 23-86 and HCC § 23-95. See Sections V(A)(6) & (7),supra. <br /> B. Declaratory Rulings on Interpretation of the Development Agreement. <br /> In the Oceanside Order, the Planning Director refused to issue rulings on four Requests <br /> on the grounds that they sought interpretations of the Development Agreement. Ex. 105-1 at 8; <br /> see also Section II(A) (table summarizing Requests). The Planning Director erred in doing so. <br /> PD Rule 3-1(a) authorizes the Planning Director"to issue a declaratory order as to the <br /> applicability of any statutory provision, ordinance, or of any rule or order of the Director or the <br /> [Planning] Department." The Development Agreement was authorized pursuant to HCC Chapter <br /> 30, which directed the Mayor to "make such rules and regulations as necessary to implement <br /> [HCC Chapter 30.]" HCC § 30-4(c). Pursuant to this directive, the Mayor promulgated Mayor <br /> Rule 1, which provides that the Planning Department "shall be responsible for the overall <br /> administration of the [Development] Agreement." Ex. 105-11 (Rule 1-8). <br /> Thus, the Planning Department is the agency charged with the overall administration of <br /> the Development Agreement, which necessarily includes interpreting its provisions. Oceanside's <br /> Petition explicitly referenced Mayor Rule 1 as a specific provision, rule, or order in question, as <br /> required by PD Rule 3-1(b)(3). Ex. 105-2 at 9. Although Mayor Rule 1 was not promulgated by <br /> the Planning Department, it vests the Planning Department with authority and jurisdiction to <br /> administer and interpret the Development Agreement. Mayor Rule 1 is thus no different than <br /> any statute, ordinance, or provision of the County Code that are enacted by the legislature and <br /> County Council, but carried out and implemented by the Planning Department. This provides <br /> the Planning Director with a clear basis to render declaratory rulings. <br /> In fact, the Planning Director's determination he cannot render declaratory rulings on the <br /> 4881-6366-3335.6.051730-00058 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.