Laserfiche WebLink
been brought into consideration." CARD, 114 Hawai`i at 194-95, 159 P.3d at 153-54 (emphasis <br /> added). Oceanside's Petition specifically noted that it was being filed"to ensure Oceanside has <br /> certainty as it continues to develop Hokuli`a." Ex. 105-2 at 12. Oceanside's Requests asked the <br /> Planning Director to provide his official interpretation of specific provisions of the County Code, <br /> where those interpretations are at present unknown, subject to dispute between parties, and <br /> "ha[ve] not been brought into consideration." The Requests do not reference the Variance, much <br /> less ask the Planning Director to review or affirm the Variance. <br /> The Planning Director acted arbitrarily and capriciously, and abused his discretion in <br /> refusing to rule on these Requests. Oceanside requests that the BOA remand the matter back to <br /> the Planning Director with instructions to modify the Oceanside Order to issue the declaratory <br /> rulings on these Requests set forth in Oceanside's Petition, or modify the Oceanside Order itself. <br /> D. The Planning Director Erred by Sua Sponte Issuing Declaratory Rulings that <br /> were not Requested by Oceanside. <br /> In Section III(B)(3)(c) of the Oceanside Order, the Planning Director states, inter alia, <br /> that: (a) "[b]ecause such a variance only excuses performance under Chapter 23, Variance 10- <br /> 027 cannot and does not effect an amendment of an existing ordinance;" (b) "a Chapter 23 <br /> variance cannot and does not . . . extinguish the authority of the DPW to set standards for or <br /> make determination regarding street construction standards . . . or usurp Council's authority to <br /> accept or reject the dedication of public infrastructure subject to the DPW Director's approval;" <br /> and (c) "variances provide relief only from Chapter 23's requirements: they do not relieve <br /> [Oceanside] from the Ordinance's conditions." Ex. 105-1 at 11-12. <br /> However, Oceanside's Petition did not request the Planning Director to issue declaratory <br /> rulings on these issues, including whether the Variance excused or amended the conditions <br /> imposed under the Ordinances, or whether the Variance extinguished or usurped the roles played <br /> 4881-6366-3335.6.051730-00058 22 <br />