Laserfiche WebLink
1. The Director Properly Provided Declaratory Rulings on the Requests Within His <br /> Jurisdiction <br /> The Director determined that the following requests were within his jurisdiction pursuant <br /> to the PRPP Rule 3 because the requests cited to a specific ordinance and applied to the facts of <br /> the case: <br /> Dedication Requirements: <br /> Request 1: Whether the express terms of Ordinance 96-7 require the <br /> dedication of the Mauka Halekii Extension, Makai Haleki`i Extension, or <br /> Connector Road? <br /> Request 2: Whether the express terms of Ordinance 96-8 require the <br /> dedication of the Mauka Halekii Extension, Makai Haleki`i Extension, or <br /> Connector Road by a date certain or any milestone in the development of <br /> Hokuli`a? <br /> Construction Standards: <br /> Request 1: Whether the express terms of the Ordinances set specific <br /> construction standards to which the Mauka Haleki`i Extension, Makai <br /> Haleki`i Extension, and Connector Road must be built to? <br /> Request 2: Whether the express terms of the Ordinances require <br /> compliance with Sections 23-86 and 23-95 of the Hawaii County Code <br /> for the Halekii Extension, Makai Halekii Extension, and Connector <br /> Road? <br /> Request 5: Whether the express terms of the Ordinances prohibit <br /> variances under Chapter 23 for the Haleki`i Extension, Makai Haleki`i <br /> Extension, and Connector Road? <br /> Variances Under Chapter 23: <br /> Request 3: Can a roadway subject to a properly granted variance from <br /> Sections 23-86 and 23-95 of the Hawaii County Code be in full <br /> compliance with Chapter 23? <br /> Request 4: If a roadway subject to a variance is otherwise in full <br /> compliance with Chapter 23, can the County accept dedication of the <br /> roadway under Section 23-10 of the Hawai`i County Code? <br /> Request 5: Can a roadway subject to a variance from Sections 23-86 and <br /> 9 <br />