My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-10-04 Planning Director Pre-Hearing Brief (PL-BOA-2024-000104 & 105)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Board of Appeals
>
Pending Petitions for Next Hearing Date
>
zCases for Past Hearings
>
PL-BOA-2024-000104 1250 Oceanside, LLC (PD)
>
2024-10-04 Planning Director Pre-Hearing Brief (PL-BOA-2024-000104 & 105)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2024 8:50:06 AM
Creation date
10/7/2024 9:10:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1§46-1241 Negotiating development agreements. The mayor or the designated <br /> agency appointed to administer development agreements may make such <br /> arrangements as may be necessary or proper to enter into development <br /> agreements, including negotiating and drafting individual development <br /> agreements;provided that the county has adopted an ordinance pursuant to <br /> section 46-123. <br /> The final draft of each individual development agreement shall be presented to the <br /> county legislative body for approval or modification prior to execution. To be <br /> binding on the county, a development agreement must be approved by the county <br /> legislative body and executed by the mayor on behalf of the county. County <br /> legislative approval shall be by resolution adopted by a majority of the <br /> membership of the county legislative body. <br /> A development agreement is not a statute or ordinance, although a resolution by the County <br /> Council is required to bind the County. A development agreement cannot be construed as an order <br /> or rule of the Director or Department because the Director alone does not have the authority to <br /> bind the County in a development agreement. The Mayor's Rule authorizing the Director to <br /> administer a development agreement does not alter the nature of the agreement itself. The <br /> Development Agreement remains a contract between two (or more)parties and outside the scope <br /> of PRPP Rule 3-1 review. <br /> 4. The Director's Declaratory Rulings Related to Dedication of Mauka Haleki`i Extension, <br /> Makai Haleki`i Extension and the Connector Road Are Not in Error <br /> The Director properly responded to the declaratory requests pertaining to the dedication of <br /> Mauka Haleki`i Extension, Makai Haleki`i Extension and the Connector Road as set forth in <br /> Ordinances 96-7 and 96-8.3 Specifically, the Director stated: <br /> To the extent Initial Petition Question 4 and Supplemental Petition Questions 6 and 10 <br /> request an interpretation of the Ordinances' conditions as applied to the Project, those <br /> questions are within the Director's authority. <br /> 3 Ordinances 96-7 and 96-8 established the zoning for the Project's approximate 1500-acre <br /> master planned community. The Ordinances, in large respect, contain similar if not identical <br /> conditions for the rezoning of the Project, and have been read together as applicable to the <br /> entirety of the Project. See, e.g. County of Hawai`i v. C.&J. Coupe Family Ltd. P'ship, 124 <br /> Hawai`i 281, 302 (2010). <br /> 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.