Laserfiche WebLink
MARTIN: Aye. <br /> SAIKI: Yes. <br /> MCNAMARRA: Aye. <br /> LEWIS: Aye. <br /> SURPRENANT: You have four ayes, motion passes. <br /> LEWIS: All right, thank you for bearing with me, that was a little bit painful. All right, so back to <br /> this. Now we are going to do it all over again for the second Oceanside case. Now, the conclusions <br /> of law—the findings of fact, conclusions of law, decision and order are virtually identical. Is there <br /> any way we can somehow shorthand this process a little? Where we adopt in mass all the same <br /> amendments. <br /> WAN: Ms. Campbell, I understand that you were the drafter of the original proposed findings of <br /> fact, conclusions of law. Can you attest that they are identical outside of the changes relative to <br /> the respective declaratory orders. <br /> CAMPBELL: To my recollection, that's correct. <br /> LEWIS: Obviously case numbers and things are different. <br /> WAN: And would 1250 assent to that? 1250 Oceanside. <br /> SIMON: Yeah, hi Ms. Wan, Derek Simon on behalf of 1250. I don't think there's a problem with <br /> that, although I think the numbering is off as far as referencing. I can double check here, but I think <br /> there's maybe one more or two more factual findings in the proposed order. I could be wrong on <br /> that. <br /> WAN: Chair, do you want to [indecipherable] place just so we can pull up those orders. <br /> LEWIS: Okay, well let him finish, maybe he can <br /> SIMON: Yeah, actually maybe I misspoke there, I apologize. The numbering is the same, I <br /> apologize. <br /> WAN: So, it appears that the parties are both affirming that the second order for case number PL- <br /> BOA-2024-000105 is the same. So, if you want to adopt the same changes as in the findings of <br /> fact, conclusions of law, adopted by the Board for case number PL-BOA-2024-000104, you can <br /> do that type of motion. <br /> LEWIS: Okay, does anybody else— <br /> WAN: Oh, did the in—I'm sorry. Before I, before we go forth, does the intervenor have any <br /> objections to proceeding this matter? Do you have any objections? Do you agree that the order is <br /> the same? <br /> MURAKAMI: We have no objection to your proceeding that way. Thank you. <br /> WAN: Thank you. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> Page 8 <br />