Laserfiche WebLink
WAN: Because we haven't even had the parties announced themselves yet, so why don't you go <br /> ahead and announce who you are and what party you represent. <br /> SIMON: Absolutely, good morning, Chair Lewis,board members. My name is Derek Simon,with <br /> me today is Ian Wesley-Smith. In the audience is Michael Vitousek, our client representative and <br /> we represent 1250 Oceanside, LLC. <br /> LEWIS: Okay, I'm going to ask you to speak a little louder and closer to your microphone as you <br /> go forward—and go ahead. <br /> MURAKAMI: Good morning, Mark Murakami and Kenneth Kupchak on behalf of the Coupe <br /> Family Limited Partnership, who have intervenor status on both appeals and the Coupes are seated <br /> behind me. <br /> LEWIS: Okay. <br /> BAILEY: Good morning, Chair Lewis, members of the board. My name is Britt Bailey, I'm <br /> Deputy Corporation Counsel here on behalf of the County of Hawai`i Planning Director, Zendo <br /> Kern. <br /> LEWIS: Okay, thank you. Appellant, did you provide notice to the surrounding property owners <br /> as required and file the return. <br /> SIMON: We did Chair and proof of that service has been filed with the board. <br /> LEWIS: Okay, I think I saw that actually. All right, we'll proceed with the hearing. I want <br /> everybody to know that we have read the record in this case. We've reviewed your proposals and <br /> arguments, so keep that in mind and try to keep repetition and we need to keep this thing a little <br /> bit reined in. <br /> I'm going to give you just a little bit of extra time that we normally would give because of the <br /> intervenor, but if I feel we're getting a little bogged down or whatever, please know that I may <br /> give you a little bit of a nudge. We'll try not to repeat. <br /> The legal issue before the board here is whether the Director's decisions, two different declaratory <br /> orders that were issued, if they should be reversed, affirmed, modified—and so, with that in mind <br /> I'll begin with the appellant. We'll have openings of about ten minutes and then we'll go into the <br /> presentation of witnesses in the case. <br /> SIMON: Thank you very much, Chair Lewis. Again, good morning, Board Members. I have a <br /> short PowerPoint I'd like to show while I go through my opening remarks, if that's okay. Okay, <br /> as you guys all know we are here today to talk about the Hokuli`a project. I got to share my screen, <br /> my apologies. There we go, sorry it's not—orientation is not great, but this is just a nice over— <br /> head shot of the overall project. You can see the shoreline park that—are we okay—you can see <br /> some of the shoreline park you'll be hearing about later today, down there wrapping around the <br /> coast and then the rest of the project as you move further up the hill, mauka. <br /> I want to speak clear about who my client is and who my client is not. We represent 1250 <br /> Oceanside, LLC. It is not the original developer of the project, that was 1250 Oceanside Partners. <br /> Kind of confusing, very similar names, but not the same people. And so, that entity originally got <br /> approval for the project back in the 1990's. Unfortunately, pretty soon thereafter encountered a <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> Page 3 <br />