Laserfiche WebLink
• The Director agreed to respond to requests 6 and 10 of the supplemental <br /> petition to the extent that the requests sought an interpretation of the <br /> Ordinances' conditions as applied to the Project. Id. <br /> 22. Overall, the Director ruled that he could issue declaratory rulings on <br /> portions of three of Coupe's twenty-nine requested declaratory rulings. Dkt. 17, ROA at <br /> 0026-28. <br /> 23. In response to Coupe's initial petition request number 4, the Director found <br /> that "taken in their entirety," Ordinances 96-7 and 96-8 require the dedication of the <br /> Mauka Haleki'i Extension, the Makai Haleki'i Extension, and the Connector Road to the <br /> County. Dkt. 17, ROA at 0029-0030. <br /> 24. In response to Coupe's supplemental request number 6, the Director <br /> found that, "to the extent the Mauka Haleki'i Extension was effectively dedicated, such <br /> dedication adequately satisfied the relevant portions of the Ordinances applicable to the <br /> Mauka Haleki'i Extension." Id. at 0030. <br /> 25. The Mauka Haleki'i Extension dedication was accepted by the County <br /> Council pursuant to Resolution 317-12. Id. The Director has never had any authority <br /> over the Resolution. Id. <br /> 26. In response to Coupe's supplemental request number 10, the Director <br /> found that Oceanside has not fully satisfied the Ordinances' roadway improvement and <br /> dedication requirements because the Makai Haleki'i Extension and the Connector Road <br /> have not yet been dedicated to the County. Id. <br /> 27. The Director further found that both roads must be constructed to a <br /> condition approved by the Department of Public Works. Id. <br /> 13 <br />