Laserfiche WebLink
Zendo Kern did not clearly err, was not arbitrary or capricious, nor did he <br /> abuse his discretion. Therefore, the Board affirmed Zendo Kern, Planning <br /> Director, County of Hawaii's Declaratory Order in the Matter of C& J <br /> Coupe Family Limited Partnership, Petitioner, Docket No. 24- 0001. <br /> Id., ROA at 4826-4827. <br /> 42. On January 17, 2025, Oceanside timely appealed the Decision and Order <br /> to this Court pursuant to HRS § 91-14. Dkt. 1. <br /> 43. Oceanside's appeal contains two main arguments: 1) the Decision and <br /> Order of the BOA did not comply with HRS § 91-12; and 2) the BOA erred when it <br /> affirmed rulings by the Director. Id. <br /> CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br /> This Court makes the following Conclusions of Law, and to the extent that any of <br /> the following shall be determined to be Findings of Fact, they shall be deemed as such. <br /> Jurisdiction <br /> 1. The Court has personal jurisdiction over the parties. <br /> 2. Appellant is an interested person pursuant to HRS § 91-8 and therefore <br /> had standing to bring their Petitions before the Commission and to bring this appeal. <br /> 3. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this appeal and the appeal <br /> is properly before the Court pursuant to HRS § 91-14. <br /> 4. Appellant's appeal is timely. HRS § 91-14(b). Dkt. 1. <br /> 5. Venue is proper in this Court. <br /> Standard of Review <br /> 20 <br />