Laserfiche WebLink
present extrinsic evidence at the declaratory ruling hearing showing <br /> County Council's intent regarding Ordinances. <br /> • 11) Petitioner requests that Planning state whether Planning has rendered <br /> a final decision on Variance. <br /> • 12) If Planning determines that it has rendered a final decision on <br /> Variance, Petitioner requests that Planning identify the date such decision <br /> was rendered. <br /> • 13) If Planning determines that it has not rendered a final decision on <br /> Variance, Petitioner requests that Planning issue its final decision on <br /> Variance. <br /> • 14) Petitioner requests that Planning declare whether its approval of a <br /> variance application is a "final agency action" that can he appealed. <br /> Conversely, if Planning determines that such decisions are not ripe for <br /> appeal, Petitioner requests that Planning provide an explanation and the <br /> legal basis therefor. <br /> ■ 15) Petitioner requests that Planning identify the appropriate appellate <br /> tribunal to review Planning's decisions on variances. <br /> 15) Petitioner requests that Planning identify whether Oceanside was <br /> required to 'provide roadway stub-outs...to provide connections between <br /> the [Hokuli'a Development Project] and its adjacent north and south <br /> boundaries. <br /> 9 <br />