Laserfiche WebLink
sought an interpretation of the Development Agreement, which is not a <br /> Department order. Id., at 0026. <br /> • Reauest 2: The Director declined to answer this request because it <br /> improperly sought an interpretation of the Development Agreement, which <br /> is not a Department order. Id., at 0027. It also sought review or affirmance <br /> of a past Department action that the Director has no control over and/or is <br /> no longer appealable. Id. <br /> ■ Request 3: The Director declined to answer this request because it did not <br /> designate any specific provision, rule, or order of the Director or <br /> Department as is required under PRPP Rule 3-1(b)(3). Id., at 0026. <br /> • Request 4: The Director agreed to respond to this request to the extent <br /> that it requested an interpretation of the Ordinances' conditions as applied <br /> to the Project. Id., at 0028. <br /> • Request 5: The Director declined to answer this request because it <br /> improperly sought an interpretation of the Development Agreement, which <br /> is not a Department order and it also sought review or affirmance of a past <br /> Department action that the Director has no control over and/or is no longer <br /> appealable. Id. <br /> • Request 6:_The Director declined to answer this request because it sought <br /> review of a past Department action which is no longer appealable. Id., at <br /> 0028. <br /> ■ Request 7: The Director declined to answer this request because it sought <br /> review of a past Department action which is no longer appealable. Id. <br /> 11 <br />