Laserfiche WebLink
a. Planning Director erred by not interpreting Ord. 96-7, standing alone, because <br /> no dedication requirement is contained within Ord. 96-7; <br /> b. Planning Director erred by seemingly qualifying the 2010 dedication of the <br /> Mauka Haleki`i Extension and corresponding satisfaction of the Ordinances' <br /> conditions related to the roadway; and <br /> c. Planning Director erred by ruling that the Makki Haleki`i Extension and <br /> Connector Road have not been constructed as required under the Ordinances <br /> because (1)both roadways were constructed pursuant to plans approved by <br /> DPW and are covered by the Variance, and (2) the Planning Director lacks <br /> authority to rule upon the sufficiency of the roadway for dedication. <br /> ROA at 988-92. <br /> 4. Appellant's Appeal sought to modify the Order or have the Order remanded to the <br /> Planning Director to correct alleged errors. ROA at 992. <br /> 5. On July 3, 2024, Intervenor filed its Petition to Intervene in General Petition for <br /> Appeal of Decision by the Planning Director("Petition to Intervene"). <br /> 6. On July 15, 2024, Appellant filed its Position Statement on Petition to Intervene <br /> in General Petition for Appeal of Decision by Planning Director, dated July 3, 2024. <br /> 7. On July 17, 2024, the County filed its County of Hawai`i Planning Director's <br /> Statement of No Position to Petition to Intervene in General Petition for Appeal of Decision of <br /> Planning Director, dated July 3, 2024. <br /> 8. A hearing on the Petition to Intervene was held on August 9, 2024, at which the <br /> Board approved the Petition to Intervene and issued the Order Granting Petition to Intervene. <br /> 3 <br />