Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Appeals,County ofHawai'i("Board")appealing the Planning Director's issuance of <br /> the Order.ROA at 975-2259.Appellant argued the following points of error: <br /> a. Planning Director erred by not interpreting Ord.96-7,standing alone,because <br /> no dedication requirement is contained within Ord.96-7; <br /> b. Planning Director erred by seemingly qualifying the 2010 dedication of the <br /> Mauka Haleki'i Extension and corresponding satisfaction of the Ordinances' <br /> conditions related to the roadway;and <br /> c. Planning Director erred by ruling that the Makai Haleki`i Extension and <br /> Connector Road have not been constructed as required under the Ordinances <br /> because(1)both roadways were constructed pursuant to plans approved by <br /> DPW and are covered by the Variance,and(2)the Planning Director lacks <br /> authority to rule upon the sufficiency of the roadway for dedication. <br /> ROA at 988-92. Formatted:Font:Times New Roman <br /> : <br /> 4. Appellant's Appeal sought to modify the Order or have the Order remanded to the Formatted:List Paragraph,Indent:Left OJS" <br /> Planning Director to correct alleged errors.ROA at 992. <br /> 5. On July 3,2024,Intervenor filed its Petition to Intervene in General Petition for <br /> Appeal of Decision by the Planning Director("Petition to Intervene"). <br /> 6. On July 15,2024,Appellant filed its Position Statement on Petition to Intervene <br /> in General Petition for Appeal of Decision by Planning Director, dated July 3,2024. <br /> 7. On July 17,2024,the County filed its County of'Hawai`i Planning Directors <br /> Statement of'No Position to Petition to Intervene in General Petition for Appeal of Decision of <br /> Planning Director, dated July 3,2024. <br /> 8. A hearing on the Petition to Intervene was held on August 9,2024,at which the <br /> Board approved the Petition to Intervene and issued the Order Granting Petition to Intervene. <br /> 3 <br />